Slashdot Mirror


British Health System Looks at Linux

DanBrusca writes "The Observer is reporting that Britain's biggest employer, the National Health Service, may ditch Microsoft due to mounting licence costs. 'Richard Granger, NHS IT director, has ordered a trial of a Linux-based system from Sun Microsystems as part of a UKP2.3 billion computer modernisation plan. The plan could see Java Desktop software rolled out across the NHS's 1 million staff and 800,000 computers to replace Microsoft's Windows operating system and Office suite of programmes.'"

12 of 477 comments (clear)

  1. How exactly is this a true statement? by sithkhan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Charles Andrews, Sun Microsystem's public sector head, said licence cost savings would come to tens of millions of pounds directly. 'And we won't force people to upgrade computers and technology on a 2-3 year cycle either. Customers can upgrade when they need to,' he said.

    Not a troll, but Linux is immune from upgrades? This is not the way to convince people to use Linux, by implying that once you install/download Linux, you can walk away without any more upgrades. I wish he had been more clear about the costs involved instead of being so vague.

    --

    is it that bad seein a hot chick again? if i see a hot chick walkin down the hall i dont say "repost"
  2. Re:Britain's biggest employer is Health? by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What happens to the doctors who want to keep using Windows?

    since when do end users get a say in their operating system? the doctors have the exact same amount of choice with the linux system that they had with the windows system: zero.

  3. Re:first china... by October_30th · · Score: 5, Insightful
    with nothing more than a respectable corporate name on the outside of the box.

    Maybe it's because that corporation provides services like an on-site support contract?

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  4. Finally! Sun has a strategy... by Chordonblue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And you know what? It looks as though it's working. Getting their desktop act together combined with StarOffice and excellent support may help Sun out of it's doldrums after all.

    I have to admit that I wasn't sold on the 'Java' desktop (whatever), but it seems that they are pushing the right buttons here.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  5. Java Desktop System name by zymano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux Desktop System would be more accurate. Don't you think ? Don't forget . Sun is payrolling SCO by paying that IP license and has always distrusted linux. Ripping the nametag Linux off the OS software and replacing it with a Java title is something a greedy company would do.

  6. Re:Linux for front end machines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are 100% correct. However the life and death machines have never run Windows or Linux, and almost certainly never will. They are very strictly the domain of Real Time Operating Systems and embedded systems. (QNX comes to mind, but I'm not 100% sure if it's ever been used in medical equipment).

    The rollout will be for generic office type machines, noting lab results, appointments, taking notes, rosters, and that hundred and one other, non-life-and-death uses.

  7. And just what's wrong with that? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You do realize that Britain's health system is socialist don't you? Under socialism, you take what is given to you.

    Oh My God. A health system where you will be treated regardless, where you can get a heart bypass, a kidney transplant, cancer therapy or IVF treatment without someone first asking for your health insurance details or your credit card number and you choose to dismiss it because it's egalitarian?

    I'm sorry, but I think a government has a few basic responsibilities towards its citizens. Making sure that it does its best to keep them all in good health by providing them all with decent medical care regardless of their ability to pay or their social standing is a good thing.

    A sick child that needs a vital operation is a sick child that needs a vital operation. Whether or not her parents can afford to pay for whatever it takes to make her well again should not factor into the equation.

    If this is what you decry as "socialist" then give me a "socialist" society any day of the week.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:And just what's wrong with that? by TomV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize that Britain's health system is socialist don't you? Under socialism, you take what is given to you

      'Realise'? It's one of the things I'm most proud of about my country.

      Of course it's 'socialist'. It's also extrememly popular, and no political party dares to change it other than to tinker with some details. All the parties know full well that to run on a platform of removing the socialist NHS would be electoral suicide. Even Margaret Thatcher was too 'socialist' to dismantle the NHS. The *performance* of the NHS is a political hot potato. The *principle* of an NHS 'free at the point of use' is something every party has to support strongly to stand any chance at all in elections.

  8. Re:Sweet.... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's the case at a lot of universities... want to know why? They want to hook you while you're young. They want you to get used to using Windows, so you won't want to break away from it and try something else.

    It's also why Lexis-Nexus does so well. Lexis-Nexus is basically a case law database. It's almost always available for free by law students in the computer labs they have. Once they graduate and get out in the 'real world', they are used to the ease and familiarity of it that they keep using it, at whatever the going rate is (It's measured in dollars per minute).

    It's OS and software crack.

    Kierthos

    --
    Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  9. Re:Row by Soko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I might be a little cynical but could it just be the NHS trying to get a better deal from MS?

    And why the hell wouldn't they? That's one of the reasons I've gotten into FOSS - I want a big stick with which to beat Microsoft into submission with.

    It's called competition, friend. Every time someone uses FOSS to get deep discounts on Windows and/or Office, it takes just a little more steam out of the Microsoft steamroller. I hate to wish ill on anyone, but this is good for the IT industry, IMHO.

    It also makes a business case for evaluating FOSS, putting it into the minds (if not the hearts) of the PHBs. It will become a more common thing to have Linux installs, which will cause Microsoft's customers to make them conform to standards that everyone can live with.

    All around, there is no downside here. Your cynicism is born from impatience, of wanting FOSS to win NOW. Patience, friend, and keep a clear head - intelligence, not emotion, is what we need to use in order to restore innovation and freedom to the industry.

    Soko

    --
    "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
  10. Let's take a moment to think about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is great. Linux has gone from a university project in a country which has never had an empire to moving in on the largest software company in the world, all within a little over ten years. This is awesome achievement. Here on /. we spend a lot of time griping about not being able to cut and paste between KDE and Gnome apps, and complaining about the fact that the latest wireless card doesn't have a driver in Debian Unstable, etc, but let's take a moment to think about how awesome this is, thank those who made it happen (Linus and a cast of millions) and also think about what we are doing as part of it. Writing a new device driver? Helping a friend set it up? Or posting as AC on /.? Whatever it is, we have to give back to it somehow.

  11. Re:first china... by mikechant · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My personal experience of the NHS (which I and my partner have used extensively in the last few years) is that it is improving rapidly - waiting times reducing, lots of new buildings, being called for appointments on time... The media always latch onto the worst cases, so as a result those who haven't used the NHS recently think it is much worse than it actually is. It is in the national interest to have healthcare available to all regardless of means in the same way it was in the national interest years ago to provide a proper sewage system instead of having it rotting in the street. It's all very well to say that each individual should be responsible for their own healthcare but that's not much consolation to those who *have* paid when they are (for example) killed by an epidemic which starts among the 'uncovered' population. Or take the example of a low paid worker with no health cover who currently makes a small contribution to GDP and taxation. A leg injury which needs an operation they can't afford permanantly removes them from the labour market, even though it is actually cheaper for the rest of the population to pay for the operation and get them back to work and contributing...