Slashdot Mirror


Open Source Finally Hits Real Silicon

pagercam2 writes "While Open Source software has many success stories, hardware and particularly chips haven't had as much. While there have been multiple Open Source projects, none have come to a final product until now. The OpenRISC 1000 has been implemented by Flextronics Semiconductor(a division of Flextronics, the contract manufacturer possibly best known for its production of many Cisco products) along with PCI, 10/100 Ethernet, serial, GPIO etc. ... Details and pretty pictures available at OpenCores.org, and it even runs uClinux. Good Job!"

10 of 247 comments (clear)

  1. So what's Sparc V? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    So what's Sparc V? Swiss Cheese? Sparc specs have been available for a LONG time.

    1. Re:So what's Sparc V? by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Have open-source cores been available to implement those specs been available for a LONG time?

      For quite awhile, as I understand. The Leon chip is an example of this. Other areas such as Fujitsu's processors and set top devices have been based on Sparc.

      I'm not saying that OpenCores is a bad thing. I'm just refuting this "we were here first" bullshit.

    2. Re:So what's Sparc V? by annodomini · · Score: 5, Informative
      Um, it's an open standard (by some definition), not open source.

      From the SPARC website:

      Any version of the SPARC Instruction Set can be licensed from SPARC International, and then used to design processors implementing that open standard. Truly - in letter and in spirit, SPARC's open - for business!
      Hell, it doesn't even look like much of an open standard. You need to license the instruction set in order to be able to implement it. This is like saying UNIX is open source, since anyone can implement POSIX and license the UNIX trademark, and because a lot of people have licensed the source code. That's not open source; it may be an open standard (although I'd argue that in order to be an open standard, you can't restrict who implements it with licensing agreements). So really, SPARC is in no way open source, and I wouldn't even consider it an open standard.

      OpenCores, on the other hand, is really open source. You get the full design of the entire chip; you could just produce the chip by sending the CAD files to a chip fab and having them produce it. All of the Verilog/VHDL/etc. are open and freely available for you to use and modify. Even if you license the SPARC ISA, you still have to design the chip yourself.

      Hell, there are plenty of ISA's that you can license. The IA32 architecture is implemented by Intel, AMD, Transmeta, and others. PowerPC is implemented by IBM and Motorola. MIPS chips are produced by lots of people. Open ISA's are a dime a dozen. What's important about OpenCores is that the full chip design is completely open.

  2. Good job but not quite by downix · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is indeed a good step for the Opencores project, but the subject itself is misleading.

    The LGPL'd SPARC-compatible processor Leon was put to silicon a long while ago.

    Give credit where credit is due, the Leon tracked over this territory years before OpenRISC.

    --
    Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
  3. Flextronics Xbox by doctor_no · · Score: 5, Informative

    >>Flextronics Semiconductor(a division of Flextronics, the contract manufacturer possibly best known for its production of many Cisco products).

    Flextronics would actually be best known for being the main manufacter of the Microsoft Xbox.

    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/9.11/flex.htm l

  4. homepage: by gimpboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Project: OpenRISC 1000

    Silicon Implementations

    Several companies are making silicon implementations (ASICs) of OR1200 using different library vendors and foundaries, process geometries from 0.35um to 0.13um. For references contact lampret@opencores.org.

    Here is an example of System-On-Chip (SOC) from Flextronics Semiconductor. It is a 32-bit general-purpose microcontroller implemented on UMC 0.18um targetting embedded applications with maximum clock frequency of 160MHz. The SOC features:

    * OR1200 processor
    * Memory Controller (FLASH, SDRAM, SRAM, DPRAM)
    * PCI 2.2 32-bit interface 33/66MHz
    * Ethernet MAC 10/100
    * UART16550
    * GPIO
    * JTAG/Debug Interface

    The OR1200 is implemented with 8KB instruction and 8KB data caches, I/DMMU with 64 TLB entries each, power management unit, debug unit, tick timer and interrupt controller. Its 32x32 multiplier is coupled with a 64-bit MAC unit.

    Test board for testing the SOC has 64MBytes of SDRAM, 32MBytes of FLASH, RS232 transceiver, Ethernet 10/100 PHY. Connectors are for RS232, Ethernet, JTAG/Debug and several Mictor logic analyzer connectors. The board has its own DC/DC regulators for 3.3V IO power supply and 1.8V core power supply. It can be used as stand alone board or as PCI standard form plugin board.

    Software running on the SOC is Embedded Microcontroller Linux (uClinux) with a console on serial RS232. The console shows a network ping to a local network host - the ping shows the Ethernet 10/100 capability.

    This board was the first prototype built (not fully assembled at the time)
    Dynamic power of the entire test board is 1.4W. Dynamic current of the SOC IO power supply is 52mA (3.3V) and dynamic current of the SOC Core power supply is 86mA (1.8V). These are nominal values measured at 100MHz system clock.

    Maximum system clock frequency of the SOC is 160 MHz. System clock is used to clock not only the OR1200 processor but the entire chip (exception is memory controller which can also run at 1/2 system clock). Max system clock 160MHz was obtained at 25C ambient temperature, 3.3V IO and 1.8V core.

    Test boards are available to Flextronics Semiconductor ASIC customers. For more information about the test boards, the SOC technical details and business engagement please contact Flextronics Semiconductor.

    IMPORTANT NOTE: For a live demonstration of the SOC in Silicon Valley, California during Dec 8th 2003 and Dec 15th please contact Damjan Lampret.

    --
    -- john
  5. /.'ed already by Chas · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here's the Google Cache:

    Project: OpenRISC 1000

    Silicon Implementations

    Several companies are making silicon implementations (ASICs) of OR1200 using different library vendors and foundaries, process geometries from 0.35um to 0.13um. For references contact lampret@opencores.org.

    Here is an example of System-On-Chip (SOC) from Flextronics Semiconductor. It is a 32-bit general-purpose microcontroller implemented on UMC 0.18um targetting embedded applications with maximum clock frequency of 160MHz.

    The SOC features:

    • OR1200 processor
    • Memory Controller (FLASH, SDRAM, SRAM, DPRAM)
    • PCI 2.2 32-bit interface 33/66MHz
    • Ethernet MAC 10/100
    • UART16550
    • GPIO
    • JTAG/Debug Interface

    The OR1200 is implemented with 8KB instruction and 8KB data caches, I/DMMU with 64 TLB entries each, power management unit, debug unit, tick timer and interrupt controller. Its 32x32 multiplier is coupled with a 64-bit MAC unit.

    Test board for testing the SOC has 64MBytes of SDRAM, 32MBytes of FLASH, RS232 transceiver, Ethernet 10/100 PHY. Connectors are for RS232, Ethernet, JTAG/Debug and several Mictor logic analyzer connectors. The board has its own DC/DC regulators for 3.3V IO power supply and 1.8V core power supply. It can be used as stand alone board or as PCI standard form plugin board. Software running on the SOC is Embedded Microcontroller Linux (uClinux) with a console on serial RS232. The console shows a network ping to a local network host - the ping shows the Ethernet 10/100 capability.

    This board was the first prototype built (not fully assembled at the time)

    Dynamic power of the entire test board is 1.4W. Dynamic current of the SOC IO power supply is 52mA (3.3V) and dynamic current of the SOC Core power supply is 86mA (1.8V). These are nominal values measured at 100MHz system clock. Maximum system clock frequency of the SOC is 160 MHz. System clock is used to clock not only the OR1200 processor but the entire chip (exception is memory controller which can also run at 1/2 system clock). Max system clock 160MHz was obtained at 25C ambient temperature, 3.3V IO and 1.8V core.

    Test boards are available to Flextronics Semiconductor ASIC customers. For more information about the test boards, the SOC technical details and business engagement please contact Flextronics Semiconductor. IMPORTANT NOTE: For a live demonstration of the SOC in Silicon Valley, California during Dec 8th 2003 and Dec 15th please contact Damjan Lampret.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  6. Re:Whats the point........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Can anyone seriously point out some practical applications of this processor?"

    Sure.

    For chips derived from this test SoC:

    MP3player
    VoIP hard phone
    Network Router
    Firewall
    Wireless Access Point
    DVD player
    Car stereo
    Cell Phone
    PDA

    For uClinux:

    It's all around you, many of the products _you_ use every day run it. Just because you think Linux means servers and desktops doesn't mean that's the only place it's widely deployed!

    J

  7. Re:Almost Used in iPod by gwernol · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just FYI, this guy's a troll. Check out his recent posts. Apparently he's also "in middle management at Honda". I highly doubt Apple are considering OpenRISC for the iPod.

    Bad troll. Bad.

    --
    Sailing over the event horizon
  8. Re:Open Source Chipsets by twiddlingbits · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sure it could be done, up to and including the design verification using chip simulations, but actually making the chips and debugging the silicon process could get very expensive. I'm sure you could find a foundry in Taiwan or China to produce it, but would there be a market for it so you could get back all those startup costs? Do you know of some folks who have a few hundred K to invest against AMD, Intel, Motorola and IBM for a tiny slice of the market? Hardware has a lot of startup costs than software to get it to market. It's not like compiling the new code for your kernal fix. Maybe if it was specialized and optimized for embedded applications it might have a shot. I guess you could call it the "Penguin" chip since I'm assuming it would be optimized for Linux.