XFS Merged into Linux 2.4
Alphix writes "As noted on KernelTrap Marcelo has merged XFS into 2.4 after a code review by Christoph Hellwig. The mail from Marcelo on LKML is here. Apparently it touched very little VFS code so people not using XFS shouldn't see any ill effects from this (it's even supposed to fix some VFS bugs).
XFS is described by SGI as '...a journalling filesystem developed by SGI and used in SGI's IRIX operating system. It is now also available under GPL for linux. It is extremely scalable, using btrees extensively to support large and/or sparse files, and extremely large directories. The journalling capability means no more waiting for fsck's or worrying about meta-data corruption.' Let the stability vs. new-features flamewar begin."
this is a good thing... and XFS seems to be pretty cool. But it is a little frustrating to have so many competing filesystems. Anyone care to enlighten me on the differences between ext3, reiserfs, XFS and JFS (is that last one even relevant?) ...?
Right.
The site where: "I'm right, as long as you ignore the things that prove me wrong", became a valid method of debate.
Last I checked ext3 has journaling too! [well it's actually ext2 with journaling].
So what's the big advantage of xfs over ext3?
Tom
Someday, I'll have a real sig.
I spend the time and effort to post some lame or possibly funny troll and the next think I know it's modded +4 Insightful. What the hell am I supposed to do when obvious trolls are being modded Insightful. Slashdot really pisses me off anymore.
Interesting about this is that Marcelo didn't want to merge big patches like this anymore. It seems he has given in to vendor pressure (SGI whining because competiting filesystems like JFS are in the kernel).
It will be interesting to see how much influence major companies will gain in decisions on the main kernel tree as their contributions grow.
Here is the same article, but in English.