Gaming Gaffes of 2003 Pinpointed?

Posted by simoniker on Tuesday December 9, 2003 @04:12AM from the unfortunate-series-of-events dept.

jvm writes "It seems that every gaming website has a Best of 2003 feature going now, and we felt that was just too cheery for our tastes. To counter that positive energy, we've assembled Gaming Gaffes of 2003 over at Curmudgeon Gamer, a list of the most embarrassing, disheartening, and bone-headed developments in the game industry over the past year. We've tried to give everyone a little frank criticism, from Sony's PlayStation 2 Online service through the lack of a Loki successor for Linux gaming, as well as specific products like EA's The Sims Online. Did we miss any?"

1 of 89 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Was the sims online really that bad? by KronicD · 2003-12-09 04:24 · Score: 1, Flamebait

I havnt actually played it... AU$60 always seemed a little pricey for something like that..

but i did read some magazine reviews and they ASSURED me that the game was good. so I'm basing my post on that.

--
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"