Slashdot Mirror


Emachines 64-bit Athlons Now On Sale

tomhudson writes "According to zdnet, emachines, the company geeks like to make fun of, finally has a toy we'd all like to get for Xmas -- an Athlon64 on the cheap :-)"

10 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. Bummer by shystershep · · Score: 5, Funny
    Microsoft has plans to deliver a 64-bit version of its Windows XP operating system for Athlon 64 desktops. Once that software is available, consumers will be able to make the step up to 64 bits.

    But not until then, apparently. Aw, shucks. Too bad there aren't any 64 bit operating systems out there now . . .

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
  2. The Geek Xmas Connundrum by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    eMachines are poo.. Athlon64 is good.. eMachines are poo.. Athlon64 is good.. eMachines are poo.. Athlon64 is good..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:The Geek Xmas Connundrum by murphyslawyer · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the eMachine comes with a free Frogurt!

      But the Frogurt is cursed!

      But it comes with your choice of toppings!

      --
      I ain't evil, I'm just good looking.
  3. Why so quiet? by PurdueGraphicsMan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The PC manufacturer and seller, best known for its low-price desktops, this week quietly introduced the T6000, a desktop built around Advanced Micro Devices' 64-bit-capable Athlon 64 processor.

    It seems odd to me that if you were the first company to release an lower-end 64 bit processor you'd be "quiet" about it. Does this hint at the possibility that they're not very proud of this system? If I were a company that produced the first lower-end computer flaunting a 64 bit processor, I'd be screaming at the top of my lungs to get people to take notice.

    Maybe it's just me...

    --


    The guitars sound good, now give me about 10db more on the cow bell.
    1. Re:Why so quiet? by trentblase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They must be waiting for the 64 bit XP to come out before they hype it!

  4. The Key to Linux on the Desktop? GAMES! by Ridgelift · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft, which released a beta version of the 64-bit Windows XP for Athlon 64 in September, has promised to ship the final version of the operating system in the first quarter of 2004. AMD has said several other companies are developing 64-bit games and other applications for its chip as well.

    Of course Linux has been able to run on 64-bit platforms for quite some time now. If the Linux community _really_ wants to invade the desktop space, we need some killer games. Games have always been the reason why people spend way too much for a new PC. It's not what the public needs, it's what they want, and games help justify the expense.

    This post may seem a bit off-topic, but I though the quote from the article which mentions Windows 64 and games in the same breath was worth pointing out.

  5. Slight Typo by fritz1968 · · Score: 5, Funny

    tomhudson writes "According to zdnet, emachines, the company geeks like to make fun of, finally has a toy we'd all like to get for Emacs

    There was a slight typo in the article description. I corrected it.

    Don't the /. editors have a spell check?

    --
    It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
  6. Holy cheap desktop by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Informative


    The Compaq 8000Z, $1,189 after $100 rebate. Mail-order only.

    eMachines have a bad rep, but they're not a bad unit. As a former Best Buy employee, the only problems we seen were the powersupply fans going out after 2 years and making a ton of noise.

    Some of my former co-workers still have some of the first eMachines running as Linux servers to this day.

  7. Not if you are a true geek... by gosand · · Score: 5, Funny
    eMachines are poo.. Athlon64 is good..

    Actually, for geeks this is an easy decision.

    poo = 0
    good = 1

    Therefore, eMachines = 0 and Athlon64 = 1

    Since you are getting both of them, logically you have to AND them.

    (1 AND 0) = 0 = poo

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  8. Bet you're right by siskbc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    They must be waiting for the 64 bit XP to come out before they hype it!

    In fact, I bet MS insists on it. Let's say I make a system, and I saturation bomb TV with ads for my 64-bit system. Consumers ask, 'what can I run on it to take advantage of the capability?' I respond with 'Windows, eventually,' at which point consumers say 'OK, I'll buy it eventually, if I remember.' Right, that works. Otherwise, I can respond 'You can run linux on it! 64-bit happy!' and MS gets super-pissed and screws me next time my OEM contract is up.

    So there's your problem. If I hype my chip, I have to hype Linux or something like that. Or I can wait for MS to catch up and hype it then, which makes more sense for my company.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat