Slashdot Mirror


FCC Approves Highway Radiosystems

prostoalex writes "According to iWon/AP, the FCC has approved a range of radio frequencies to be used on US highways for transmitting important traffic information. The technology is still 5-10 years away from being implemented in cars and on the roads, but the FCC has set aside a special area of the spectrum instead of sharing the frequencies with other applications and devices. As for uses, there's currently a test running at an intersection in McLean, Va., where sensors can automatically warn a motorist when another car is approaching, thus helping to avoid a collision."

7 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. FM SPec. by JPriest · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does someone have a decent brakedown of the FM freq allocations? It seems like that space is getting crowded.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:FM SPec. by mikewren420 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Spectrum is not crowded, it's a myth that the US Government likes pushing... What's the allocation between 230 and 400MHz? How about the 500-800MHz range? Look out for the black helicopters!

      In all seriousness, I'm intersted in what allocation was assigned to this new technology.

    2. Re:FM SPec. by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Co-operative cruise control ("I'm car X at coordinates Y and I'm braking at Z rate") for improved speed management

      thats a pretty good idea. Or better yet co-op speed limits.

      A display that shows how fast everyone else is going instead of some arbitrary sign. It is relatively well documented that more accidents happen where people are all driving different speeds than when all the people are speeding.

  2. Pleeeeze by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What the hell is to stop this from becoming as useless as the current emergancy vehicle light switching system (ala traffic lights), that used infrared frequencies? Some schmoe is going to make a device that makes your car think you're going to rear-end someone at his whim... Until finally the whole system will have to be thrown out, due to abuse.

    This thing will be abused before it's even anywhere near fully deployed... what a waste... and as per the article, how about getting people to focus on driving... as in paying attention to thing around you... how the hell is making sure you don't rear-end the guy infront of you not a normal driving task? WTF?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  3. Radar Detector + Long range Wi Fi + GPS by Rob+Cebollero · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anyone thought of or has taken staps toward integrating a radar detector with wireless and GPS to create a long-range, fault tolerant radar/lidar detection network? Seems like this this is a patent wating to happen...

  4. Re:Yeah... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And why not? The real point in car-to-car communication on a highway is to keep everybody moving at roughly the same rate of speed so that there are no crashes, because a crash slows everybody down.

    That's the principal behind most automated highway systems... everybody goes at the same high speed in tight formation until somebody indicates they want to leave... at which point the cars ahead speed up, the cars behind slow down to create space, the departing car departs, then the lead cars slow and the trailing cars accelerate so that the formation is reformed.

    Highways are a great situation where the tragedy of the commons come into play. Somebody wants to go faster than everybody else, faster than they themselves can go, and as a result causes a crash that ruins the ride home for everybody behind them.

  5. ...a more secure Homeland... by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the blurb:

    "Smart radio technology means smarter highways, safer roads and a more secure homeland," FCC Chairman Michael Powell said.

    How, precisely, would a radio broadcast regulated to be useful no further than 100 meters away be useful in securing the "Homeland"? At first, I chalked that up to some sort of bureaucratic lemming syndrome where anything that happens needs to be connected to securing something. But then I put my brain in gear and figured it out; what a great way to create an industrial strength vehicle tracking system. Build out a collision avoidance system and, "discover" how useful it is in tracking bad people, and then...generalize!

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!