Slashdot Mirror
Bob Young's Open Letter to SCO/Darl McBride
Oskie-wee-wee writes "Infoworld is carrying a story about Bob Young (Red Hat, Lulu, Classy Formal Wear, Hamilton Tiger-Cats, etc.) and his open letter to SCO and Darl McBride - in response to Darl's open letter 'defending, in one breath, the SCO suit, the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, and the Supreme Court Decision in the Eldred vs. Ashcroft case.'"
See me in my bra HERE.
it's official: the debian era is over. the era of slackware is over to. (that ended a while ago only moldy old diehards and noobs who think its a ticket to "leet" still use slack)
The future of linux is fedora and gentoo. This will be the decade of great progress for Linux brought to the masses through the flagship projects combining the most progressive elements of the open source community: Fedora and Gentoo!
Hail the new epoch!
GUK IS GAY
Darl you are a thieving cunt.
Yours 'one finger in the air salute'
A. Linux User.
P.S. Your software sucks.
Dear Darl,
Many smarter people than me wasted their time trying to argue with you and all have wasted their breathe. I on the other hand am taking this one step further right now and calling you out for a celebrity source code death match to see who can code hello world faster. You can continue to ignore the SCUM Group all you want but eventually we will catch up with you and give you an atomic wedgie so far up your ass you'll be shitting printf for eons.
Your ramblings are like you claiming that, someone broke into your Calvin Clone boxer shorts and made your penis shrink to the size of your brain and now you have to spoil it for the Open Source community with your constant stream of lawsuits of which, no one but yourself can understand.
As Bush would say, "Your strategery has greatfulnessly misundersestimated the force", that force is Open Source you punk ass media whore. SCUM group acknowledges our acts of moronicy as a ploy to liven up the scenario. You on the other hand, have created with your Jerry Springer'ish mumblings, a laughing stock of those who have worked hard and brought Open Source out of the darkened states where it once rested.
Secondly aside from turning this into a serious rambling of my own, let me just state on behalf of all of SCUM you sir suck and shall be receiving one of 436,539,084,760,223,491,853,214,325,213 subpoenas we are currently autogenerating filled with the same nonsense you create.
Yours efermally, Durl
Durl McLame, CEO SCUMGroup.com
http://www.scumgroup.com
MoFscker
If the open source community is so confident that it's correct, why are IBM and others refusing to pay the expenses should any of their users be sued over intellectual property violations? Microsoft recently extended full protection to its users, should they be sued for using Windows. Why are the large vendors of the Linux community such as IBM, Redhat, and SuSe being so niggardly? I'd like to believe the open source community is right, but the vendors would do themselves a huge PR favor by extending the protection I've discussed to their users. What's stopping this from happening? And even if it isn't necessary because SCO has no IP rights in the kernel, someone else could easily come along, make a similar claim, but have a much stronger case. This is one of the few things that bugs me about open source and Linux. I'd feel much more confident if the vendors weren't so niggardly and would provide protection to anyone sued for using Linux.
Help me. I've been modbombed by a few people with entirely too much time on their hands.
eet my knob rob
** sing along if you know the words! **
.... I'd rather be a Bomber than a FUCKING tiger-cat ... ...
Ohhhhhhh
Ohhh - i'd rather be a Bomber than FUCKING tiger-cat
Ohhhhhh - I'd rather be a Bomber than a fucking tiger-cat,
cuz the ti-ger-cats, suck shit!
GO BIG BLUE!@!!
Not a goatse link