Appeals Court Rules Against RIAA in DMCA Subpoena Case
JohnTheFisherman writes "My Way News is reporting that a Federal appeals court ruled that the RIAA can't compel the ISP to provide the name of the downloaders in their case against Verizon. In fact, the court said that one of the arguments the RIAA used 'borders upon the silly.' I believe most here will agree that this is great news." We've been following this case for a while.
Where I work, running P2P in our network is a cause for summary dismissal - it doesn't matter if you're a professor or a student. Zero tolerance.
After it was accepted by Republican controlled House and Senate.
The moron has been our moron-in-chief now for 4 years. It's about time you start taking responsibility for his bad, bad decisions. You can't blame it all on the previous administration.
I do, however, feel some sort of sympathy with all of you Clinton haters. I never realized before that you really could hate a president so much. Both as a person (religious bigot, weak, stupid) and as the institution (horrific, extremely dangerous foreign policy). After four years of GWB administration I'm beginning to understand the paranoia and hate with which certain people reacted to Clinton administration.
This in itself brings many problems. Similar to that which has been noted in children of divorced couples. Studies have been done on this and I'd link to them if I could, but not everything gets put on-line.
Children benfit from the singular central role models of two parents of opposite sex. Take away either and replace them with a multitude of 'replacement' role models and the children simply get confused.
Too many role models is just as much a problem as none at all.
And then Al's quote:
Ah! So Al didn't "invent" it, he "created" it. Huge difference!
/me rolls eyes
My Greasemonkey scripts for Digg &