Slashdot Mirror


UserLinux Continues Debate Over GUI

An anonymous reader writes "Following up the earlier Slashdot item on this, LinuxWorld is carrying both sides of the discussion as to whether UserLinux GUI should be GNOME only, as Bruce Perens last week decided "by fiat," or include KDE."

6 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. Why the licensing argument is bogus by fritmebufstek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try to find a commercial Gtk app. After googling, you'll perhaps find some from Ximian ( which can arguably be ruled out ), and perhaps a few more. Now try to find a commercial Qt app. You'll find hundreds ( including high-profile ones from Adobe and others ).

    This means that commercial developers are willing to pay for a quality toolkit, as much so on Linux as on other OSs. Free software folk needn't worry either, as Qt on X is free as in both.

    1. Re:Why the licensing argument is bogus by manyoso · · Score: 4, Informative

      More reasons why the licensing argument is bogus:

      The emerging Linux cell phone market: choice? Qt
      IBM PDA reference implementation: choice? Qt
      Adobe? Qt
      Samsung? Qt
      Sharp? Qt
      Boeing? Qt
      Daimler? Qt
      Chrysler? Qt
      Disney? Qt
      Fujitsu? Qt
      General Electric? Qt
      Hitachi? Qt
      Honda? Qt
      HP? Qt
      IBM? Qt
      Intel? Qt
      Mitsubishi? Qt
      NASA? Qt
      NEC? Qt
      Shell? Qt
      Siemens? Qt
      Sony? Qt
      Toshiba? Qt
      Toyota? Qt
      Unilever? Qt
      Volkswagen? Qt

      Hmm, I'm starting to sense a pattern here. Now, go find the list of ISV's or commercial companies developing with GTK+. And no, RedHat and Sun don't count. Why you ask? Because they are distributions silly. You didn't see me listing all the distributions that support or prefer KDE/Qt.

      And yet another reason the so-called licensing issue is bogus? The FSF prefers GPL'd libraries as a matter of principle. Not LGPL. That is why they changed the name to 'Lesser' and put up the why-not-lgpl paper. So, the FSF would rather Qt and GTK+ were both GPL with *no* ability to support proprietary developers... gratis or otherwise. Besides, shouldn't the community benefit from some form of recompense from proprietary developers using our Free systems? Yes, we should and with Qt, we do.

      Some community names went around spreading this ridiculous 'licensing problem' with Qt as deliberate FUD. And now we all have to clean up after their mess.

  2. Re:If it's truly for USERs by AssClown2520 · · Score: 5, Informative
    My understanding is this is to be an enterprise user system, not a home user or personal user. The whole point is enterprise management and distribution management. Think of an enterprise employment of windows. Every large shop that I know of uses a drive mirror installation and seriously limits any configuration choices that a user may have.

    I've said it before. I agree 100% with including only one GUI. The reason for Gnome over KDE is simply a license issue. I personnaly like KDE better and it is what I will continue to use, as I am not the target "user" of userlinux.

  3. Re:Why does it matter so much? by fritmebufstek · · Score: 5, Informative

    It matters to the KDE folk, because we ( a group of some twenty enthusiast KDE and Debian developers ) were intending to work together with UL on making UserLinux a KDE based enterprise distro that would easily beat other available offers. Bruce's decision stopped this plan, but we are continuing the effort standalone now. Furthermore, the licensing argument is bogus, read why below.

  4. Re:If it's truly for USERs by DF5JT · · Score: 5, Informative

    " My understanding is this is to be an enterprise user system, not a home user or personal user. The whole point is enterprise management and distribution management. "

    'Zakly.

    What is it that GNOME has to offer in this regard?

    1.

    KDE Kiosk Mode, also known as lock-down mode, makes it possible to restrict the capabilities of the KDE3 environment in powerful and flexible ways including but not limited to the ability to:
    1. Restrict desktop, application, and printing actions.
    2. Restrict internet access on a URL basis at a desktop-wide level.
    3. Restrict desktop resource customizations.

    Such functionality is invaluable for unattended operation of UserLinux in a kiosk setting as well as for wide-scale enterprise deployment of a controlled environment.

    2.

    A new easy-to-use administration tool, yet in the stages of development, will build on top of the KDE Kiosk Mode and expand upon the features in an exciting direction. The tool will enable scalable management of users, their settings and IT privileges. The design goals include:
    1. Full scalability from medium to large organisations.
    2. Usable by both KDE and non-KDE applications.
    3. Seamless integration into existing IT infrastructure.
    4. Roaming support.

    Please expect more detail and an official announcement in 2004 Q1.
    3.

    An Integrated Terminal Server and Client employing a new and highly efficient X compression technology thereby enabling seamless desktop integration of applications based on a remote compute server. This feature will be in addition to KDE's existing remote desktop support (VNC and RDP) and is especially exciting in light of the fact that it enables a satisfying desktop experience on a thin client even with a low-bandwidth connection (e.g. dialup) to the application server. The technology will bring us on par with Citrix, Tarantella, SunRay and Windows Terminal Server offerings.

    4.

    KDE Print: Enterprise-grade technology for intimate management of printers and print jobs, adaptable to innumerable creative tasks.

    5.

    KDE Core Killer Apps: Whilst too numerous to list here, we expect to leverage core KDE applications where appropriate. In addition to the well-known applications several pertain directly to the enterprise including:
    1. The upcoming Kontact, an integrated personal information management suite, which in conjunction with the Kolab Server will provide a powerful standards-based groupware solution.
    2. The upcoming KERP, an Enterprise Resource Planner.
    3. A set of financial trading tools currently in development.

    ISVs in particular will be pleased to note that the KDE/Qt environment sports a rich body of development tools that leverage the elegant and powerful framework provided by KDE/Qt as well as tools enabling development in areas ranging from HTML production to UML modelling, CAD design and document publishing.

    6.

    KDE brings an impressive body of localization and internationalization effort to the table. With over 80 translation teams and KDE 3.2.x to be available in an estimated 50+ languages, KDE is a compelling choice for an enterprise desktop with an international audience.

    Where is GNOME's visionary roadmap for a subsystem as powerful as that?

    Thought so.

  5. Re:What's the big deal by sydb · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't mean to stalk you in this story!

    You can see KDE go the same way as netscape if UserLinux ever becomes popular.

    KDE made a choice when it based itself on Qt. Times change and KDE's problems have changed - KDE is a good Free Software* desktop environment. But because Qt is GPL'd, it presents a barrier to proprietary development that is against the goals of UserLinux.

    If being the default desktop of UserLinux is so important to KDE, why don't they re-implement their desktop ontop of an LGLP'd toolkit?

    If it's not so important that they are willing to do that, then people should stop being upset. In the choice of a default there will be a winner and one or more losers. XFCE lost here too, but they're not whining. Only one desktop can be the default!

    As for the Netscape comparison, I think there were other factors which led to Netscape's demise, like a bloated product (Communicator). Look how people prefer Firebird over Mozilla. There's still time for IE to be ousted - all the time in the world, from now to the end of time.

    * Or is it? Look at what TrollTech say here - TT don't want you using Free Qt on inhouse projects, but the GPL says you can. This makes me distrust TrollTech.

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.