SCO Gets More Desperate; Sends More Letters

isn't my name writes "The New York Times is reporting that SCO has sent new letters to Linux-using businesses with specific examples of infringement. SCO has its fiscal earnings call scheduled tomorrow at 11am. In all probability, these letters are designed to get analyst/reporter interest focused on their claims instead of the numerous fundamental problems with their case. So, slashdotters, we need to find a copy of the letter and tear it apart with specificity before tomorrow morning in the US East Coast, so that any analysts/reporters will not be distracted."

Comments

Desperation...

[Anonymous Coward]

... is a 5 letter name: Linux!

MOD PARENT UP

[Anonymous Coward]

You moderators are lame. The parent has a point. You disagree with it, and mark it as a troll.

Slashdot sounds more dedsperate than SCO!

[jkrise]

Honestly! What has Slashdot or OSDN achieved by publishing more than 100 articles on a non-tech company? Have the Slashdot posters or the OSDN been able to actually do something constructive in dismantling SCO?

Why should we care two hoots about those 'poor sucker' investors? If people can see nothing immoral in investing in a dubious firm, a Slashdot protest-letter or 'fact-revealing' exercise is't gonna do anything good.

In fact, if it isn't immoral to make money off suckers and less-informed blokes, I think SCO is an excellent opportunity to invest money in! Better than OSDN, ,if you ask me.

The pathetic attempts to stoke response from readers, whose time could be spent writing better code - is, well, ,just pathetic. There's no need to worry about SCO for the next 18 months - atleast for lay users. Corporates who will pay money for non-existent non-proven Intellectual-Property-rights can and should take care of themselves.

There are more programmers to be saved than the bunch of sucker investors in SCO stock.