Slashdot Mirror


Looking Back At Windows Security In 2003

thebatlab writes "Help Net Security has an interesting look at security in Windows during 2003, with various blurbs from related parties at Microsoft as well as security 'bigwigs' such as Russ Cooper. It's interesting to read the comments from external parties, as they tend to be very reasoned comments and don't simply attack away over recent 'indiscretions' and 'security lapses' Microsoft has had over the year."

2 of 327 comments (clear)

  1. Does anyone know... by biendamon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...where to get a definitive list of security holes in Windows (not Office or other add-ons) for the month of December?

  2. Re:Its crap but just as crap as anyone else by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Microsoft have had their share of vunerabilities over the last year but not significantly more than linux has..."

    Hello? What alternate universe are you living in? We spent a good chunk of our summer and fall chasing MS-BLAST infected computers. We had to detach computers from the network before upgrading them to XP, because if we didn't they'd get hit before we could patch them.

    Perhaps you are playing semantic games - perhaps in absolute numbers there haven't been "that many" Windows exploits. But in terms of wasted IT time; in terms of network downtime; in terms of severity of attack there is just NO comparison. Our Linux, Solaris, and OS X boxes have required almost none of our time.

    --
    #DeleteChrome