Slashdot Mirror


Californians To Vote On Largest DNA Database

mpthompson writes "California law enforcement officials are backing a proposed ballot measure that would give them authority to operate the largest DNA database in the world and collect DNA samples from everyone arrested or convicted on felony charges."

2 of 78 comments (clear)

  1. fingerprints? by asquared256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's already done with fingerprints... I don't see how this is much different.

  2. Fine With Me by MBCook · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I'm sure there will be quite a few "big brother" privacy claims posted, but frankly I HOPE that this happens. I have no qualms what so ever.

    Now, if California wanted to make the database for every single citizen, I would object. If it was for anyone convicted of anything (parking tickets included), I would object. But it's not...

    It's FELLONS. These are not jaywalkers, they are murderers, rapists, duggies (dealers, trafficers, etc), and more. I don't mind this segment of the population losing a little bit of their rights, because they chose to give them up when they decided to commit a crime. I don't mind this just like I don't think felons should be allowed to have guns (I am otherwise very supportive of right to bear arms). They are FELLONS, we shouldn't be crying for them.

    Now that said, there are bound to be false convictions, and this is the one caviat that I have. When a false conviction is found, that person's DNA needs to be removed from the database IMMEDIATLY and any convictions/etc based on the DNA that was collected because they were a fellon (fruit of the poisonous tree). But ONLY THAT DNA. If the person submitted their DNA during the investigation, that obviously gets to stay in the database, it's only DNA collected after they were convicted that should be "tossed" in such a case. If this part is held, I have no qualms what so ever.

    Bring on the database.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.