Microsoft FAT Licensing Plan - No Big Deal?
prostoalex writes "InternetNews.com describes the reaction to Microsoft's decision on FAT licensing. It doesn't look like the company is expecting to make any significant money out of licenses (there's also a cap of $250K, so none of the big guys will have to pay millions to Microsoft). It also doesn't look like Linux companies are stressed over this decision. "We are only accessing FAT32 file systems, not using them. This licensing program is of little interest to SuSE", a Novell/SuSE spokesperson said."
This makes me wonder if they will do the old bait and switch for .net implementations - i.e. mono. Or Sun could do even do this for Java. I'm glad I'm starting to learn Python.
Microsoft's plan to instate heavy licensing fees on the use of the steam-powered butter churn, the Phalanx military formation, and the Barnes method for increasing the efficiency of telegraph lines seem to have had little effect as well.
Irritable, left-wing and possibly humorous bumper stickers and t-shirts
RTFA
Well, I guess this statement gives you an answer why MS, Bill Gates, Ballmer... have so much money and you, my friend, never will.
I've stopped reading your post here but I think I also saw figure of $100 M in there. Does line containing this figure say what I thought it would?
Bill Gates is the gate of Bill Clinton's poo hole. Windows=William Is Nuts, Dirty, Oppulent, and Wasteful, Suckah
I coulda written my post correctly, but I was high. If you can't understand it then I'll know why, 'cos I got high. x3