Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft FAT Licensing Plan - No Big Deal?

prostoalex writes "InternetNews.com describes the reaction to Microsoft's decision on FAT licensing. It doesn't look like the company is expecting to make any significant money out of licenses (there's also a cap of $250K, so none of the big guys will have to pay millions to Microsoft). It also doesn't look like Linux companies are stressed over this decision. "We are only accessing FAT32 file systems, not using them. This licensing program is of little interest to SuSE", a Novell/SuSE spokesperson said."

1 of 235 comments (clear)

  1. First Post by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: -1, Redundant

    Why license the FAT File system? It's old and superior file systems exist

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy