Slashdot Mirror


PSX Review At Lik-Sang

bhtooefr writes "Over at Lik-Sang, they've got a review of the new PSX, which was released in Japan on the 13th. In it, they take a look at the new design, debunk some myths (that the new controllers were incompatible, and that the ports are USB 2.0 - they're 1.1), and crack the case open. They didn't like how it's incompatible with some peripherals and the MultiTap doesn't work."

13 of 180 comments (clear)

  1. I wish Sony didn't call it the PSX. by Pluvius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now everyone's going to be confused and think you're referring to the PSOne when you're actually referring to this, or vice versa.

    Rob (Of course, this thing looks like it's going to tank anyway, so maybe it won't be a problem)

    1. Re:I wish Sony didn't call it the PSX. by freeweed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Reading the Slashdot headline I honestly thought there was ANOTHER version of the original Playstation released. The blurb talked about USB, which confused the hell out of me. Thankfully the site wasn't Slashdotted, it explains in there what a "PSX" actually is.

      I don't think Sony is in touch with video game fans; those of us who've been around enough years call the 2 Sony units the PSX and the PS2. Only recently have I even seen people use "PSOne" online. My reaction on the blurb was "SO??". Makes me wonder how bad an impact this could have on sales.

      Or, will they just rename it when they bring it to North America?

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:I wish Sony didn't call it the PSX. by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Super Nintendo with a CD drive. 200 made,"

      Proof? I'd sooner believe a limited production run of the Sega Neptune than what you describe.

      "PlayStation X (PSX): The PlayStation as we know it."

      Calling the original PlayStation "PlayStation X" is somewhat like calling Nintendo's previous console "Ultra" or their current one "Dolphin." The "PSX" designation referred to the pre-release project that Sony worked on that eventually produced the console ("eXperimental") and it just happened to carry on in popular use after the console was released.

      "PlayStation One (PSone): Original PSX, just in a smaller form factor."

      Pay closer attention. It is referred to by Sony as either "PlayStation (PSOne)" or simply "PSOne."

      "PlayStation 2 (PS2): The PS2 - how hard does it get?"

      Yeah, everybody knows that stands for "Personal System/2!" Oh, wait...

      At any rate, Sony never actually sold the original PlayStation as "PSX." At worst they're co-opting popular slang.

    3. Re:I wish Sony didn't call it the PSX. by bugbread · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A possible explanation of the confusing nomenclature: Nobody calls the PlayStation a "PSX" here in Japan. In fact, I only found out about this name from foreign websites. The PlayStation is the "PlayStation", the small playstation is the "PSOne", the PlayStation 2 is either "PS2" or "PlayStation 2", and the new thing is the "PSX". In Japan, where it's released, there is no confusion.

  2. WEll... by YtseMetropolis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now, if only we can have the portable Playstation which seems to be in development forever, I'd be happy.

    1. Re:WEll... by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What, like this (warning: GameSpy link - don't click any ads)? BTW, he's made MANY 2600 handhelds, and the occasional NES and SNES handheld.

  3. Hmmm... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Also due to the orientation of the PSX controller ports, Playstation 2 Multitap units are not compatible therefore ruling out any 4-player action.

    Oh, no no no no no, I'm sure Sony will come out with a nice little overpriced device that will let this all happen.

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  4. I'm not a big fan of all-in-one devices... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can see the appeal of this device in Japan, where space is at a premium. In the event that it does come to the US, I have to wonder how successful it will be - how many people want one device that does everything? Sure it's cool and convinient when it works, but do you really want to have one part break and thus lose your DVD player, your console, your PVR, and your DVD burner? Plus, I would tend to think most people geeky enough to want these already have all those devices and would be less than willing to buy them all again.

    IMHO, most all in one devices tend to be compromises - they do lots of stuff, but none of them well. After having a TV/VCR that broke on a regular basis and seeing some very difficult to configure all-in-one printer/copier/scanners, I tend to stick with standalone devices.

  5. Re:Hehe by Pluvius · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Because proprietary media costs a lot more, tends to hold less, and is just about as pointless. Didn't you hear about how some pirates got around Nintendo's copy protection using Phantasy Star Online and a broadband adapter?

    Rob

  6. Pirating GC games is hardly more complicated by Pluvius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...now that someone has released a loader you can use with little technical knowledge. At the very most, pirating GC is as hard as pirating XBox is with the fonts exploit. And hell, you can't even pirate PS2 without a modchip (which requires either quite a bit of money or a decent amount of skill) or that semi-retarded "load the CD from the top" method.

    No, the reason why GC isn't pirated quite as much is because the PSO/BBA exploit was only discovered a few months ago. The XBox fonts exploit has been around for at least a few months longer, and the modchips for both PS2 and XBox have been around for far longer than that. The PSO exploit also isn't quite perfect (since it relies on the BBA to transmit information to the GC) but I figure that will be fixed eventually.

    Rob

  7. Re:Sony's graphics not good? by JFMulder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Than play with the Xbox versions, it's even better. As for huge landscapes, see Amped, that's a game with a far horizon.

    Some PS2 games look good, but all crossplaform games look better on Xbox. Visit websites like Gamespot to see which version is the best and the Xbox one always (except in a few very rare cases) comes first.

  8. White? by borg1238 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this is a minor point, but the color will make it stand out like a sore thumb on most people's shelves. Why not make it black or gray? It would at least match Sony's own line of Wega TV's.

    Maybe it their subtle way of getting it noticed:
    "What's that big white box on your shelf"
    "Oh that's the PSX!"

  9. Re:Sony's graphics not good? by borg1238 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're wrong. Have you seen: Grand Theft Auto 3 & Vice City? Grab a helicoptor then fly around -- amazing graphics and how they can draw huge landscapes.

    Sorry dude, I love my PS2, but almost any multiplatform game out there will look better on the XBOX. It's simply a more powerful system.

    Grand theft auto is a great example of this. From the Gamespot review of the XBOX version:
    "The PlayStation 2 versions looked fantastic, given the relatively underpowered PS2 hardware, and the ports that appeared on the PC did a nice job of cleaning up and improving upon the original PS2 games. But the Xbox versions of the games go one step further than that. You'll immediately notice reflections coming off the cars, and the lighting in general is better. The texture quality and character models have been improved. The draw distance seems a little further out. And the frame rate remains pretty stable throughout. The games take advantage of the Xbox's audio prowess by playing in Dolby Digital 5.1 sound and offering support for the custom soundtrack feature."