Slashdot Mirror


Measuring Pollution In Humans

CHaN_316 writes "Scientists have begun measuring pollutants in our body and the results sound like a chemical clean-up site. They've found things such as flame retardants, chemicals derived from DDTs, mercury, uranium, cotinine, and many more. The concern is a lot of this stuff is ending up in mother's milk. But hey, at least in the event of spontaneous combustion, I'll be partially protected."

5 of 423 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Healthy future ... by Dachannien · · Score: 4, Informative

    Type 2 diabetes is becoming a great concern in the U.S. as well, especially in children - an abundance of very fatty foods and a decrease in physical activity are among the causes.

    I think Milloy's point, however, is that life expectancy has increased tremendously over the past hundred years, although medical advances probably greatly outweigh any negatives caused by pollutants.

  2. Re:I inquired with my county about testing my wate by HeghmoH · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a firm believer that no tap water is safe for human consumption

    I mostly believe the opposite. Remember that before the invention of tap water, people drank out of rivers and streams that ran over lead and mercury deposits and had animals (and people) shitting in them. We can tolerate a good deal of crud in the stuff we consume.

    That's not to say that pure water isn't preferred, but I wouldn't go as far as to say that tap water is unfit for human consumption altogether.

    --
    Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
  3. Re:I inquired with my county about testing my wate by turbosk · · Score: 5, Informative

    IAAAC (I am an analytical chemist) who worked directly with testing water samples from municipal water treatment facilities, schools, and private clients. The Clean Water Drinking Act of 1976 mandates standards for community water suppliers, including standards for lead, iron, biologicals, copper, manganese, aluminum, nitrates, organics, chlorine, turbidity, etc. Your public water company has to have its water tested at a certified lab monthly, and if any of the parameters are out of whack, the EPA will hear about it faster than you can say "boo".

    Saying your county won't pay for your water to be analyzed is a little untrue/misleading. Ask your water comany to send you results of the tests they have done. On the other hand, if you get your water from a private well, then the onus of testing IS on you. And as your /. analytical chemist, I *highly* reccomend you get at least the lead, aluminum, and E coli numbers on your well water.

    pax,
    fred

  4. Some usefull links by ThenAgain · · Score: 5, Informative
    I used to be involved in this stuff. Here are a few useful links.

    The Environmental Working Group
    These are some seriously dedicated guys who do environmental research and advocacy. They also maintain several interesting projects, including:

    • Body Burden - Directly related to this article
    • The Chemical Industry Archives - I used to work with these documents. They're a massive collection of the chemical industry's own documents which describe how little they care about you.

    Bill Moyers - Trade Secrets
    Bill Moyers did a great film about the problem.

    A Google Search For Philip Landrigan
    Dr. Philip Landrigan has done extensive work on body burdens in children and has written a number of books.

  5. Re:Healthy future ... by sam+the+lurker · · Score: 5, Informative
    Life expectancy at ages 20 and up haven't changed all that much...


    The National Center for Health Statistics doesn't quite agree with you.
    Life expectancy by age, race, and sex, 1900-2000 U.S. Life Tables, 2000, table 11
    Summary: A person that reached 20 years of age between 1900-1902 could expect to live until they were 62.79 years of age. A person that reached 20 years of age in the year 2000 could expect to live until they were 77.8 years of age.
    15 extra years sounds tremendous to me. ;-)