Slashdot Mirror


Konqueror Compiled For Mac OS X; KOffice Next

scishop writes "Benjamin Reed has just compiled Konqueror for Mac OS X after porting the KUniqueApplication class. A screenshot of the running program can be found here. According to Reed's blog, 'next up is KOffice.'"

9 of 509 comments (clear)

  1. OS X has BSD and X11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    What's the big fucking deal?

  2. why help a megacorporation like apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Why do you give your free labor to help a megacorporation like apple?

  3. That's good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    because, from what I've heard, most of the browsers for OSX blow goats.

  4. Great. An also-ran browser on an also-ran OS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Yay.

  5. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    yo mama, nigger

  6. MOD PARENT DOWN , GOATSE links by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    er, now that I've gotten your attention

    WTF?

    How about mod parent down, user too brainless to post JPGs, uses PDFs with embedded images

    Geez, WHAT A MORON.

    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  7. Way off dope! (Preview: File, Export ... imbecile) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    No, you fuck off you pompous ass, because if you open Preview, pull down the file menu and select export, you can save that PDF as almost any format you want without waiting for your pirated copy of Adobe Photoshop to load.

    Besides, like you said, it has nothing to do with the fucking article. Get a life!

  8. Why bother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Who cares? Use MS Office

  9. Why isn't there Epiphany and Nautilus for OSX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    Because the Gnome guys don't want to see the ugly GTK file dialog on a beutiful OS like OSX. You will never see a Gnome Zealot use OSX!

    The Gnome Zealot translate-o-matic! *updated*

    Ever since Gnome 2.4 (and the BETA 2.5) was released, I have found more and more gnome zealots who MUST absolutely advocate GNOME at every possible moment. Here is a guide to some of their claims, and what they really mean.

    Claim : Unlike KDE, Gnome is free
    Translation : GPL is freerer than LGPL. LGPL allows corporations like Novell
    and Sun to have propeitry forks and lock away their changes from the user. Now
    that Novell has taken over Ximian you can expect Gnome to get put under
    corpirate lock. With KDE you have the choice, you either PAY UP or pay with
    your source code. Most companies agree, the majority of commerical software for Linux is written in Motif and Qt, and NOT GTK. Apart from Ximian's desktop, there is no major product using GTK.

    Claim : Nautilus is much better than konqueror.
    Wrong, if your using nautilus for anything more than a simple finder clone you
    can forget it. No split screen, no ioslaves (gnome-vfs can't compare, sorry) and forget about being able to
    have a decent file dialog, not to forget that it is as unstable as hell and is
    STILL slow on >3 Ghz machines. The latest version decided to copy Windows 95, complete with a my computer icon on the desktop.

    Claim : Gnome is easier to use than KDE
    Yep, nothing like using gconf-editor to edit all except the most trivial of
    settings. Want tear off menus? Want a useable file dialog? You won't find it
    here. Gnome was a lot more usable back in the 1.4 series, before sun came along with their usabillity "study".

    Claim : Gnome has eye candy
    Yes, my pirated Win32 fonts with the patent infringing font renderer. Bit
    stream vera sans looks like Tahoma put through a shreadder! Of course I still
    reboot into windows to print using "Comic Sans MS. Gnome themes don't even let you change the colour scheme. Looking at sites like art.gnome.org you will see that the majority of themes are the same one in different colours!

    Claim :Gnome has a new web browser
    Yawb! Along with Galeon, mozilla, thunderbird, konqueror, atlantis, lynx,
    netscape and w3m. Yes I need another browser! Not to mention that its got a
    religiously offensive name and it dosen't allow bookmark folders. It also
    crashes like a crazy! Apple chose khtml for a REASON! its stable and light! Epiphany is also a faliure, it has gone through 6 major bug fixes and none of the major distrobutions use it because they stick with decent browsers.

    Claim : Gnome is more popular than KDE
    Despite the fact that the only mainstream Gnome based distro has been EOL'd,
    and all the newbie distros such as Mangadrake, Lindoze, $u$E, Lycoris,
    Xandroze, Gentoo use kde default, bruce perens decided to make a gnome based distro and everybody hated it because KDE wasn't in it.

    Klaim : Kou KDE kuys kust ke kick kof khe K
    Our G's and monkeys are SO MUCH better, gedit, glib, gconf, bobono, ghex,
    gless, same-gnome, gstreamer.

    Claim : Gnome is themeable
    Yep, choose from High, low and medium contrast, default, and clean ice. Wan't
    to change the colour scheme? USE GCONF NOOB, plus if you complain about it we
    will tell you to fuck off and go back to Windows or KDE.

    Claim : Gnome has multimedia framework
    Its a kludge of esd combined with broken xine libraries. No wonder it crashes
    all the time and dosen't work on 95% of video files.

    Zealot : My Gnome work station.....
    My 2Ghz G5 box my mum bought for me from PC world, that is made of
    made to break components and running Debian