Slashdot Mirror


Top Searches of 2003, A Dave Odyssey, Banned Words for 2004

Shockmaster writes "Yahoo! has released their top searches of 2003. Google also has a year-end Zeitgeist wrap-up for popular search queries." Elsewhere, TheFairElf writes "The Miami Herald has Dave Barry's annual roundup of the year's main events titled 2003: A Dave Odyssey. The most significant events include the release of the fifth Harry Potter book 'Harry Potter Reaches Puberty and Starts Taking Really Long Showers' and the discovery of large quantities of sugar in Iraq which the CIA claimed 'is a leading cause of tooth decay'." Finally, wideangle writes "'Calling all metrosexuals: Get rid of that bling-bling - or at least find another word for it. In its annual compilation of language irritants, Lake Superior State University singled out 17 words and phrases that it says ought to be banned as overused, trite, euphemistic or just plain inaccurate." LOL, we wish everyone an Xtreme New Year from Slashdot, OMG.

17 of 331 comments (clear)

  1. unneeded words by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Funny
    Heck, "metrosexual" isn't even needed. The English language has several words already to express this exact concept. Among them:

    fop: A man who is preoccupied with and often vain about his clothes and manners.

    dandy: A man who affects extreme elegance in clothes and manners.

    dapper: a. Neatly dressed; trim. b. Very stylish in dress.

    gentleman: A well-mannered and elegant man with high standards of proper behavior.

    I can go on...there are others. But come on, pretending the reemergence of the gentleman fop is something new is just retarded. Jumping on the bandwagon of some writer's column...yuk. Might as well start incorporating slogans from WWE into your daily speech, it's the same concept.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  2. The actual list. by Worldly+Iconoclast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems they must have edited it to make it politically correct. I'm betting these are the real ones:

    Top ten Jennifer Searches:
    1. Jennifer Lopez naked
    2. Jennifer Aniston naked
    3. Jennifer Garner naked
    4. Jennifer Love Hewitt naked
    5. Jennifer Connelly naked
    6. Jennifer Ellison naked
    7. Jennifer Tilly naked
    8. Jennifer Esposito naked
    9. Jennifer Capriati naked
    10. Jennifer O'Dell naked

    Top ten movies:
    1. Harry Potter slash fiction
    2. Matrix download divx
    3. Lord of the Rings download
    4. Star Wars dvd download divx
    5. X-Men hentai
    6. Spiderman fanfic
    7. Finding Nemo download
    8. Hulk download .avi edonkey2000
    9. Matrix Reloaded download
    10. The Ring download edonkey

    The internet is a sad place.

    1. Re:The actual list. by Jerf · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is the Internet. Don't you think those should be links?

      Top ten Jennifer Searches:
      1. Jennifer Lopez naked
      2. Jennifer Aniston naked
      3. Jennifer Garner naked
      4. Jennifer Love Hewitt naked
      5. Jennifer Connelly naked
      6. Jennifer Ellison naked
      7. Jennifer Tilly naked
      8. Jennifer Esposito naked
      9. Jennifer Capriati naked
      10. Jennifer O'Dell naked

      Top ten movies:
      1. Harry Potter slash fiction
      2. Matrix download divx
      3. Lord of the Rings download
      4. Star Wars dvd download divx
      5. X-Men hentai
      6. Spiderman fanfic
      7. Finding Nemo download
      8. Hulk download .avi edonkey2000
      9. Matrix Reloaded download
      10. The Ring download edonkey

      Isn't that better? And surprise surprise, Slashdot is pissed off. "Too few characters per line (20.1)?" Now that's a wierd metric. Still needs more. Probably hit the compression filter next... well, if you see this this got through.

      Shame on you, if any of those links show up in your browser as "already visited"!

  3. expressions I hate by renehollan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "for all intensive purposes" - It's "for all intents and purposes", dipwad.

    "quote... unquote". There is no such thing as "unquote" -- it's "end quote". Using "quote unquote" as a prefix to the purported quote is doubly irritating.

    "It's like this...." I don't give a blinking fuck what it's like, I want to know what it is.

    People who mess up the meanings of precision and accuracy tick me off. 165.04452 +/= 50 is precise, but not very accurate. Abuse of significant digits is another irritant.

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:expressions I hate by jrockway · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree with you, especially with the "intensive purposes". I think people say that because they can see a purpose as being intensive, while they cannot see intents and purposes. Actually, they probably have never read anything other than an online forum, so they haven't picked up any language idioms. I often read my friends' papers and they read like an online forum... if you're in an online forum, write like it (like I'm doing now) but otherwise, DON'T! I'm worried that good writing will be shunned by my generation (like dude, whoa, that's a big word. is that on the SAT?).

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:expressions I hate by Nugget · · Score: 5, Funny

      Such errors are pardon parcel with people who learn the language through speech and not through reading. I could of made that same mistake had I not encountered the phrase in print before hearing it. Sadly, people who don't read just can't cut the muster. I'd just assume watch a movie instead of read a book.

    3. Re:expressions I hate by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wonder if that came from Spanish slang. After 7 years of learning Spanish in the classroom, I once used "donde esta Cecilia?" to ask one of my sisters where the other one was, and the sister I asked (who lived in Oklahoma) corrected me with, "its adonde, not donde." I was like, "that's funny, none of my teachers, professors, or books have said that.. ever." She was like, "well, that's how native Spanish speakers speak.

      So, there you go.. its not, "where is she?" Instead, its "where's she at?" (technically, "at where is she?") according to Spanish slang.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
  4. OMFG ROFLMAO by jrockway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Actually, I don't think lol is such a bad expression. To me, it means something like "heh" or more like breathing out and saying "is that right?"* in real life. Since you can't express those emotions in words, we made one for use online. OTOH, people misuse lol and say it after everything. That in and of itself is not bad, if there's a funny conversation it seems right to use lol instead of a smiley. I liked smileys back when they weren't turned into gay (sorry, that's a word that needs to go) yellow things. So lol stays as text and works out better.

    In summary, replace "LOL" with "gay" as an adjective. That would be better.

    Also, anyone who says "bling-bling" is going to be shot by me. And anyone who writes in the passive voice.

    Wow, the first time a grammar nazi-like post has been on topic. I'll go now :) [lol, heh, rofl]

    --
    * Actually, 'lol ok' == 'is that right?' IMO. My friends and I have shortened that to lok, which is more efficient (save on bandwidth, my friends) than 'is that right?'

    --
    My other car is first.
    1. Re:OMFG ROFLMAO by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 3, Funny

      > When I was at university, a friend of mine dated a
      > younger girl who used "lol" (pronounced "lawl") in verbal
      > conversation. That was too weird.

      My kids say it out loud too.

      I'm considering selling them.

  5. The Netherlands by CSharpMinor · · Score: 3, Funny

    Note that the most popular film search on Google for the Netherlands wasn't LOTR, the Matrix, or Finding Nemo; it was 2 Fast 2 Furious.

    --

    Whatever it is I'm complaining about, I'm sure the Republicans did it. This is /., after all.
  6. OMFG... by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    IANAL, but IMNSHO, TLAs and other MIAs should not be banned. After I RTFA, I was ROFLMAO at the proposition that these quips have no place in the lexicon... YMMV, of course, and of course YAETYOO...

  7. Re:But that's the way language develops by jrockway · · Score: 3, Funny

    Words that sound like English are fine. Metrosexual? Fine. I don't know what it means, but it doesn't irritate. Bling bling? Don't you just laugh when you hear that? Or want to injure someone? It's not a word, it's just stupid. We educated folk (or those who think they are ;) need to draw the line somewhere.

    Next thing we know, Bush is going to "glork glork" the Iraqi people. Have fun misunderestimating that.

    --
    My other car is first.
  8. The REAL number one search... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The REAL number one search of 2003 was for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction, wasn't it?

  9. Yeah, right. by sparklingfruit · · Score: 3, Funny

    1. KaZaA
    2. Harry Potter
    3. American Idol
    4. Britney Spears
    5. 50 Cent
    6. Eminem
    7. WWE
    8. Paris Hilton 9. NASCAR
    10. Christina Aguilera

    I wonder which ones Yahoo were paid to feature in that "top 10" and which one made the real top 10.

    I thought the #1 search has always been "Sex".

  10. "Shots rang out" by ElJefe · · Score: 4, Funny

    On a related note, why are explosions always rocking, e.g., "Explosions rock Baghdad"? Why don't they ever roll?

  11. Banned Word Nomination by ewhac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Normally, bad grammar and malformed words just roll off me. But for some reason this one really gets my back up:

    "Incentivize"

    The verb form of "incentive", presumably intended to mean, "to provide incentives for," which is another way of saying 'encourage' or 'influence'.

    ...Except that "incentive" is itself the noun form of the verb "incent", which means to encourage or influence. So you could use an actual word, save five letters, and not look like a pretentious twit.

    Don't get me started...

    Schwab

  12. The Out/In List by PizzaFace · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not the new year without the Washington Posts's annual list of what's out and what's in for 2004.