Slashdot Mirror


AOL Now Publishing SPF Records

SPF Fan writes "It looks like SPF is starting to catch on with the bigger ISPs. AOL is now publishing SPF records which you can verify with 'dig aol.com txt'. Will Hotmail and Yahoo be far behind? Who else is publishing SPF records for their domains? Slashdot has covered SPF in the past a couple times."

2 of 340 comments (clear)

  1. Re:How does this reduce spam in any shape or form? by usama88 · · Score: 0, Troll

    You seem to complaining that this might not work because everyone on the planet would need to use it and even then spammers could use their own domains.

    Certainly it's true that nearly everyone will need to get on board for this to work. Fortunately, it should be an easy update on both the MTA and DNS ends.

    The real advantage here, I think, is that it will make filtering and blacklisting much easier. Instead of trying to filter on 18 zillion weird rules and scads of IP addresses, some of which may have some valid users, you just need to filter on domain names.

    For this to work, we will need one or more trustworthy registries of bad domain names. And it should probably be distributed, with a way to continually update it by automatically propagating the list of bad domains to all clients. There should be a way to get a domain into the blacklist very quickly if anyone receives spam from that domain.

    Alternatively, a system could be in place to treat all new domains as bad by default. That has obvious problems though -- how would you get your domain trusted? Would it require a VeriSign like identification process? I would oppose that -- I think people should be able to buy domains and freely run email servers on them without paying some central "authority."

    My biggest concern with this idea is that I run a domain where I give out POP email addresses to people. I'm still trying to figure out how that will affect me.

  2. Re:NewsFlash by WhodoVoodoo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Please note how he said "In case any windows users are interested but can't use dig" instead of "For all you windows using LUSER$ who don't get to use the super-secret-ultra-high-tech dig! LO!!L!L!Lzzzz"