Slashdot Mirror


MIT Technology Review Slams IPv6

PCM2 writes "In the MIT Technology Review, Simson Garfinkel, noted author of Internet security books, writes that "the next version of the Internet Protocol, IPv6, will supply the world with addresses by the trillions. Too bad it will also make the Net slower and less secure." His article goes on to explain that all IPv6 code is untested and therefore insecure; that IPv6 makes encourages 'peer-to-peer based copyright violation systems'; and of course, that the switch is never going to happen anyway (and yet, somehow, the United States is 'falling behind')."

10 of 709 comments (clear)

  1. Simson Garfinkle? by spectral · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Am I the only one that read that as Simon Garfunkle? I know there's supposed to be an 'and' in there, but still...

  2. Trillions of new addresses by strider69666 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Think of all the pr0n sites! Now instead of millions of sites full of crap, we get TRILLIONS of sites full of crap! Yippeee!!!!

    --
    Dude. Dude. Dude. Dude. DUDE!!!! Duuuudde. Yeah, I guess you have a point there. (Baseketball)
  3. I know Simson Garfinkel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    There is no way to put this nicely. Simsong is a very smart person when he isn't high on MDMA.

  4. Feelin' Groovy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    I just wanted to say that "Feelin' Groovy" is one of my favorate songs and I'd like to thank Simson Garfinkel for introducing me to it.

    Huh? What? Oh, different guy? Simon Garfunkel does sound different doesn't it. Looks the same though doesn't it?

    Oh, nevermind.

  5. Re:Another "IPv6 won't be here soon" article... by Deusy · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Why is it that I hear in my head:

    "These exclusive articles were brought to you by the company that cares, Microsoft.

    We welcome you to an age of safe computer. If it doesn't come with the label 'Trusted Computing' then it is a computer you can not trust. Non-trusted-computing may be used to commit phelons and endanger your safety. Non-trusted-computing may allow the use and execution of insecure software.

    Remember, open source means the bad guys can see it's weaknesses!

    Microsoft: the company that cares. If you run anything else, you could be at risk."

    Then, in so-fast-it's-unintelligible-voice-mode:

    "Microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-monitor-your-co mp uter-usage. Microsoft-reserves-the-right-to-keep-copies-of-all -your-information. Based-on-information-collected-Microsoft-reserves- the-right-to-prosecute-or-to-give-your-details-to- those-that-can-prosecute.
    Microsoft-reserves-the- right-to-take-away-your-civ il-liberties.
    You-have-no-rights."

    All with a picture of Bill Gates smiling, sitting in a garden full of blossoms and butterflies.

    Lovely.

    --

    Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  6. Simson Garfinkel .... by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... Didn't he sing "Bridge over Troubled Water"?

  7. Re:IPv6: Not Ready for Prime Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    He's a known troll (look at his nickname). Don't get your panties all bunched up now :)

  8. Meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    He is a known troll but if you look at his posting history he *does* have some intelligent stuff. I guess that's what makes him such a good troll.

  9. Simon and Garfunkel by ReadParse · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought they were still on tour. And, anyway, what do they know about -- oh wait... never mind.

    RP

  10. Re:untested code... by EddWo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    You do know that isn't try don't you?
    NT boots into protected mode from NTLDR.
    Dos apps run in NTVDM a virtual machine that simulates the dos environment.
    NT is a pure 32bit protected memory multi tasking OS. It was written from scratch from 1988 onwards.
    They made it compatible with the existing APIs for the DOS based systems but it is fundamentally different underneath.
    They are so different that it took another decade till Windows XP to unite the two product lines and provide enough compatibility options for everything from dos, win16, win32 and directx games to get everyone to migrate with minimal difficulty. At the same time they had to compromise on some of the benifits of the new kernal, such as securiy, in order to ensure compatibility.
    Sure theres still a recovery console option you can boot into, but it isn't based on dos, the command syntax just looks the same.

    Longhorn is where the migration away from the decade old Win32 programming model begins, but backwards compatibility has always been one of Microsofts selling points, so support for it is likely to remain for at least another decade.

    http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/features/1998 /w inntfs.asp

    --
    "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "