Slashdot Mirror


Kiss Technology Counters MPlayer GPL Arguments

Snaller writes "Recently, MPlayer claimed that KISS Technology were violating the GPL by using parts of their MPlayer movie playback code in proprietary software. Now The Danish National Radio has interviewed the managing director of Kiss Technology, Peter Wilmar Christensen. He denies all claims of wrongdoing and suggests that if the pieces of code are the same, perhaps they were leaked from Kiss Technology and were then used by the Mplayer group. He also adds that the GPL is a weak license which has never been tested in court. Gabucino from the Mplayer team is furious, and accuses the director of outright lying."

10 of 634 comments (clear)

  1. First Motherfucking Post of Goodness!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Booyah, bitchez!

  2. smallmind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    daniel parsons has no wang.

  3. Well, well, well. It looks like Kiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    is telling you filthy hippies to Kiss its ass.


    First you steal from SCO, and now you demand that other's stop stealing from you? Pay your $699 fee cocktonguers.

  4. License Review by m0rph3us0 · · Score: -1, Troll

    Mplayer stealing from other companies = good. Other companies stealing from mplayer = bad.

  5. MOD DOWN, PARENT TROLL, CHECK HIS JOURNAL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
  6. Yu shud spel betta. by Spoke · · Score: 0, Troll

    Um, yeah.

  7. Re:And As Always... by siphi · · Score: 0, Troll

    Set opera to reload every 5 secs on their site. Mwahahahahaha.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  8. Re:GPL == strong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    Y o u r c o m m e n t v i o l a t e d t h e " p o s t e r c o m m e n t " c o m p r e s s i o n f i l t e r . T r y l e s s w h i t e s p a c e a n d / o r l e s s r e p e t i t i o n . C o m m e n t a b o r t e d . Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 12.8). Your comment has too few characters per line (currently 12.8).
    mmmmm good! Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition.Comment aborted.
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page) Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition.Comment aborted. WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWIDE!


    Alan Partridge

    Preferences
    Subscribe
    Journal
    Logout

    Sections

    Main
    Apache
    Apple
    Ask slashdot
    Books
    BSD
    Developers
    1 more
    Games
    10 more
    Interviews
    Science
    3 more
    YRO
    2 more

    Help

    FAQ
    Bugs

    Stories

    Old Stories
    Old Polls
    Topics
    Hall of Fame
    Submit Story

    About

    Supporters
    Code
    Awards

    Services

    Tech Jobs
    Advertising
    PriceGrabber
    Personals

    Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.
  9. Re:Pardon ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Mod Parent Up!! Or else he won't take a bath for another 6 months!!

  10. Re:GPL == strong by oolon · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why is BSD more "viable", BSD licence just gives it away for all to use, with that licence everyone is allowed to take your work. Many people (myself included) would rather it rotted on a shief that do that, but are more than happy to allow people to use and improve it so long as they give changes back. BSD is not an alturnative its different sure you don't have to worry about courts.. but thats cos you have nothing. BSD more "Commerical", why should I care if its commerical or not? Why should I care if someone is UNABLE to make a buck from my work due to the licence? Don't like that? Tuff write your own code or licence someone elses.

    James