Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM Releases XL compilers for Mac OS X

Posted by pudge on from the faster-you-say dept.

Visigothe writes "IBM released their XL Fortran Compiler and XL C/C++ Compiler for OS X. The compiler is binary compatible with GCC 3.3, and has multiple levels of optimization, creating binaries that are much faster than their GCC-compiled counterparts." No prices are noted, and the planned availability date is January 16.

4 of 84 comments (clear)

  1. Benchmarks by melquiades · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has anybody seen any useful benchmarks of compiler output comparing XL and GCC on PowerPC?

    That would be interesting to see.

  2. FASTER OS X? by zulux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What does Apple use to compile OS X - and if IBM get the Objective C sections woking properly, could Apple use the IBM comiper to get OS X to run faster?

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:FASTER OS X? by rmlane · · Score: 5, Interesting
      As mentioned by others, the majority of OS X is compiled by GCC.

      The exception is Quicktime, which uses (and has used since well before OS X) a older, custom version of the IBM compilers. I believe, but am not 100% sure, that Quicktime has always used the IBM compilers on PowerPC CPUs.

      This is very good news for Apple's science users, one of the real problems pushing Mac boxes into some markets has been the lack of a really good Fortran compiler. The performance boost for C/C++ code will also be appreciated.

      As for a wholesale transition of OS X to the IBM compilers: next to no chance. QA of the transition would take far too long and absorb resources that could be better used on other improvements. It would also cause problems with the Open Source versions of Darwin, so expect the vast majority of OS X to remain GCC compiled.

      That being said, I would expect that certain chunks will be transitioned, where it makes sense. The output of the IBM compilers is binary compatible with GCC, so you can recompile (and re-QA) chunks of the OS where you'll get a major improvment.

      Quartz Extreme, CoreFoundation and AppKit spring to mind, but don't expect this to happen in 10.3 or 10.4, more like 10.5 or 11.0.

  3. Autovectorisation ? by Jesrad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Weren't these compilers supposed to bring automatic conversion of multiple 32bits arithmetic operations into Altivec-accelerated code ?

    --
    Maybe we deserve this world ?