Slashdot Mirror


China Abandons Long-Distance Maglev Effort

Ralph Lee writes "China has chosen to abandon its Maglev train effort from Beijing-Shanghai, according to this AP story: 'Besides cost, "the maglev technique was excluded because it does not match the wheel-track technique used by railways in China," the report said, citing Wang Derong, vice-chairman of the China Transport Association.... The scrapping of the 9-year-old maglev project - two weeks after the country's first maglev, a short stretch in Shanghai, began regular operation - represents a setback for the development of the technology in China, which many had seen as one of its key markets.'" The short 18-mile MagLev run mentioned earlier remains in operation, but China is not going to use magnetic levitation for the planned 750-mile Beijing-Shanghai link.

3 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Price per _half_ mile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're american, you just proved them right. There is 1.6 kilometers in a mile, not 2.

  2. Re:Price per _half_ mile? by JohnDoe.Slashed · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why in the world are they quoting price per half mile? Or is it really "price per kilometer" and they think the American public is too stupid to understand what a kilometer is?
    Funny that a lot of mail I receive from that part of the world doesn't measure my penis estimated growth in 1/2 inches...
  3. Re:Inevitable? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it were truly cheaper to maintain in the long run it would be in much wider use, ESPECIALLY in command economies like China. Welcome to the world of Economics.

    Uh, right. I present the following parable:

    So, this economics professor and his student are walking along the street, and the student spots a $20 bill lying on the sidewalk. Being a starving student, he says, "Look, there's a twenty! We should pick it up and buy some lunch."

    And the professor, being an economist, shakes his gray-bearded head and says sagaciously, "No, no, that's impossible."

    "What are you talking about?" asks the student. "It's right there!"

    "Well, you see," says the professor with a chuckle, "if there were really money lying on the sidewalk, someone would have picked it up already."

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.