Slashdot Mirror
UK Mobile Providers Introduce WAP Censorship
godsmoke writes "UK mobile providers have formed an alliance to block 'inappropriate content' from cell phone users under the age of 18. 'It covers images, video, gambling, games, chatrooms and net access but not premium rate voice and SMS services', says a BBC News article. The Code authorizing the changes is called the 'Code of Practice', and: 'Content with an 18 certificate will only be available when the network operators verify the age of the user'."
"The new code is going to make many people ask why, if the mobile people can do it, the fixed internet people can't." - John Carr
Here we go again...
Cell phones are not the same thing as the Internet. The Internet was design such that if a node goes down, traffic will route around it. A similar thing would happen if censorship were to be pressed upon us at the ISP level (analogous to the cell phone service providers) as users would simply find ways around it with tunneling protocols, mirrors, and the like.
And I have a feeling that this "new code" will be exploited as well. Of course it's a good thing that the phone companies want to protect children, but there are many ways that censorship like this can aid them in having a monopoly over other providers of mobile phone chat services. We'll just have to see what happens.
It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
- E. Debs
On the other hand, please don't answer that. It's a rhetorical question, meant to make people think.
Surely you are trolling.
16 year olds don't need internet phones? Who do you think will be programming these things for the next few years?
If I were 16 right now, I would be hacking away at my cell phone like nobody's business.
I have no problem with my kids checking their email or schedule or updating their website from their phone...
I just want a way to know what they are viewing is age appropriate.
AC
What if I as the parent of a 17 year old, give them permission to look at porn?
I'd be more worried if I was the parent of a 17-year-old who isn't already looking at porn, parental permission nonwithstanding.
---
DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
I never cease to be amazed that the time, energy, and money people will spend trying to "protect" young people from the things they don't want them to see.
The reason for these efforts is simple, information control is the only effective means of mind control. Control what people see and hear and you control what they think. Much of child rearing seems to be institutionalized brainwashing. This made no sense to me when I was a child or a teenager and it makes even less sense to me now at 31, or at least no rational sense.
There is no rational reason to want to hide things from your children. There are plenty of irrational (and downright sick) reasons I can think of though, most of which are a combination of stupidity and insanity.
Unfortunately I don't think this will ever change because that would require human nature with all its failing and weaknesses to be improved and that hasn't happened in 10,000 years or more.
Lee
Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.