Mice In Space
benmcgruer writes "Space.com is reporting on the Mars Gravity Biosatellite Program. This international, student-lead, project aims to explores the topical issue of biological response to low gravity, specifically the 0.38-g found on Mars, by building and launching their own satellite, complete with 15 mice. NASA, Fark.com and Universe Today also have coverage."
If you think the message board on Fark is a legitimate source of news, you've been reading them too long.
I wonder how much of the data will be irrelevant because mice walk on four legs, not two, thus decreasing the bone loss?
Reduction of gravity means eduction of weight not mass.
Surely to get a significant reading you'd need a mammal of equivalent mass and biology.
The weightlessness experience of the MIR cosmonauts provides much better space biology than sending a few mice into space.
And wtf is the IIS for then???
And this is not a reduced G vs micro G comment.
Worst
How much extra will it cost to bring the unit back to earth? I would save a little money on the return trip and add more sensors (or better sensors), maybe plan more experiments.
This is cool. If I was a physics student in highschool, I think MIT jumped to the head of the class. What is Cal-Tech going to do to top this?
Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."
Isn't it kind of a stretch to say Fark.com has coverage of it? At least Slashdot tends to give you a paragraph or two summary, at fark you get one line, and a bunch of unmoderated comments.
I was initially worried about the ethics of sending mice on a one-way mission to Mars ("gee, let's see the effects of starvation in the low-gravity environment"), but I was glad to see that this will only be a simulation with the intent of bringing the mice back:
If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.