Fear Effect, Hunter The Reckoning Movies Optioned

Thanks to GameGossip for pointing to a Hollywood Reporter article revealing that German uber-producer Uwe Boll has optioned the rights to movies based on Fear Effect and Hunter: The Reckoning. Boll, who had previously claimed his planned Dungeon Siege film had "major crossover potential because of its unique blend of action and fantasy, on the order of Lord of the Rings", and is behind the House Of The Dead and Alone In The Dark movies, says Hunter: The Reckoning (originally from the White Wolf pen-and-paper RPG) will be a "hard, brutal, fast-paced ensemble film in the tradition of 'X-Men.'" Hunter will "shoot this summer in downtown Vancouver", with budgets for the 2 movies "ranging from $15 million-$25 million", but it's not known why Eidos' Fear Effect was optioned.

Comments

Re:Please, sweet God, NOOOO

[Corfitz]

Game-based movies are not necessarily bad. The problem is when movie producers stick too firmly to the game instead of just using the world, the general mood and/or possibly the heroes/villains. Sometimes they are forgetting that a movie does not necessarily turn out a big hit just because the game is a hit - they need professional writers to work on the plot, the script and the dialogue to make a good movie.

I could imagine some quite decent movies from, say, the White Wolf line of RPGs, but I do agree that some games might be difficult if not impossible to convert: I for one hope we'll never see a Duke Nukem movie.

Re:Please, sweet God, NOOOO

[Golias]

Seriously, doesn't hollywood have some good movie ideas?

Disney's most successful non-Pixar, non-Miramax movie in the last 20 years was based on a theme park ride. A ride!

Previews for "The Mask 2" feature yet another CGI dancing baby.

They just released yet another gross-out romantic comedy starring Ben Stiller, on the heels of yet another sentimental romantic comedy starring Hugh Grant.

So, yes. Hollywood is out of ideas.

Special psychic advanced review: Both of the movies mentioned in this article will suck.

Re:Zombies gone Wild!

[Golias]

Ture, but in the days of the old "B" pictures, some film-makers took the opportunity to make a guaranteed-success movie and used it to make a good work of art. Hollywood never cared much what the content of a B picture was, as long as had a thrilling title and came in under budget. Sometimes the result was garbage like the films lompooned on MST3k, but every once in a while, a director would realize: "Hey, I'm getting the chance to make a movie here. That's something 99% of the people who want to make movies never get. I should take full advantage of the opportunity." Whenever that happened, we got movies like "Invasion of the Body Snatchers."

I wish that the "under-$20 Million" wide distribution industry had more people that understand that. If they did, we would get a lot more flawed-yet-fun direct to video movies like "The Cube" and a lot fewer pieces of crap like "Resident Evil."

Re:Please, sweet God, NOOOO

[RevAaron]

Hollywood forgot what it was like to make new movies. These days, they prefer to do remakes or sequels to movies made long, long ago. I imagine there are interesting and original scripts out there that would make good movies, but Hollywood ain't using them.

They are in the business of making money, not providing good movies. There was a time when those two overlapped more, and perhaps could still today- but Hollywood doesn't seem to think so. They'd rather try to beat every dead horse they can find, capitalizing on nostalgia.