Perens on Patents
lewiz writes "An interesting interview with Bruce Perens over at the BBC. He's up discussing the role of HP, IBM, et al and the move towards Linux. However, his main point is about software patents and how they are much more of a problem than SCO: 'We're looking at a future where only the very largest companies will be able to implement software, and it will technically be illegal for other people to do so.'"
Fool me once shame on you
exactly. Linux is part one in the ten point platform of those Commie Hippies. They want everyone to be equal and free. Not in the United States! Perhaps the radical religious linux freaks should move to China, and learn what real work is like. What do we do to commie bastards? We fuck em in the ass.
... I'd like to know what question he wishes the interviewer had asked, and what his response would be.
Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
Meanwhile Microsoft gave $1 billion of computer aid to the United Nations? When was the last time a Linux company did that, perhaps I was just too busy that day to read the headlines. And no, donations of crappy software off SourceForge do not count, how about real computers and stuff?
This guy is storing up karma for what will probably be a massive crapflood. Mods, if you give this guy points, you're supporting goatsex links, homoerotic stories, and gay nigger propoganda. Mark my words.
People will always be using illegal software, whether it be pirated software or softwarre that infringes on someone else's IP. It all comes down to cost, if someone can't afford it, they'll find some other way to get it. If software is published by only a few large companies that overcharge for their products, people will find other means. It almost reminds me of a quote from Jurrasic Park, "Life will find a way."
I was starting to go through SCO withdrawl. What with the hearing being delayed until February 6th, I thought there might be an entire day without SCO on Slashdot.
The most recent crap I took a few hours ago is too good for Slashdot.
I despise this site so much, I make printouts of these threads and use them to wipe my ass.
When given the choice between:
having a general purpose system that does 50% of what I need to do
having a general purpose system that does 100% of what I need to do
I am always going to pick the second. Linux does not have:
Illustrator (lack of this is HUGE, and don't tell me to use Sodipodi 'cause it ain't cuttin' it.)
Photoshop (don't tell me to use the GIMP, I've been having this argument with people for 6 years and it is not holding any more water.)
You also can't play Ultima Online on it (at least if you want to use UOAssist.)
Now, that isn't to say that Linux doesn't kick ass for certain specialized applications. 3d comes to mind- there are many many high quality 3d apps you can get for it, and most of them are things I would not mind using, (assuming someone else paid for them, ha ha.)
But it's not a platform for graphic or industrial designers- yet. And I've been saying that yet for years and years so who knows.
I will however agree that Linux would work for all of my non gamer non graphics professional friends who have Win98 PCs infested with porn spyware and trojans.
What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey
James T. Nail (Crocodile Shoooooees) of Newcastle Upon Tyne says, "Mod this up aboot a thoosand insightful."
Stick Men