Why Do Email Admins Make Viruses Worse?

gripdamage asks: "Why are email administrators still sending virus bounce messages, when everyone knows viruses forge the sender? This effectively doubles the amount of email traffic due to the virus (triples in the case that the recipient is also notified). As one of the links says 'any AV software or admins that have it mis-configured [so] that it is continuing to send out notices...to forged senders, deserve to be ridiculed.' I have received 4 times as many erroneous bounce notifications, because of MyDoom , than the actual virus, so the bounce messages are much more of a problem! This is a problem deserving publicity, so that email admins will be shamed into doing the right thing." The problem is that most bounces are automated responses, the simple thing would be to turn them off. Of course, the rational of the automated response is to hopefully notify the infected user of the problem -- what a catch-22! What kind of policy would you recommend when it comes to spam, e-mail and automated responders?

Comments

It's a subtle form of spam..

[zcat_NZ]

and should be recognised as such.

AV vendors know damn well that 99% of viruses spoof addresses. More than anyone else, since studying viruses and figuring out what they do is their JOB!!

The only possible excuse for this behaviour is that they get FREE ADVERTISING out of it. It's spam advertising AV software and/or mail filters, plain and simple. It should be treated the same way as any other spam.

Re:Bounce the headers

[David Byers]

I've yet to see a single useful bounce generated by an AV scanner, because they insist on sending the bounce to the forged sender.

People using AV scanners need to hook them up to their SMTP servers so the SMTP server can reject the message as it is being sent. That way innocent people won't see a deluge of misdirected bounce messages.