Slashdot Mirror


AirPort 3.3 Extends WPA Security

tackaberry writes "Apple has released an update for AirPort. Version 3.3 (AEBS firmware version 5.3) includes support for Wi-Fi Protected Access (WPA) specification for non-Extreme AirPort cards (WPA was added for Extreme cards last fall in version 3.2), an alternative to the oft-maligned Wired Equivalent Privacy (WEP). Those who wish to use WPA will have to have Mac OS X Panther 10.3."

6 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. Re:What's wrong with WEP? by NetJunkie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some implementations of WEP are weaker than others. The main problem is that given enough data from your network I can break your key rather quickly. Usually you are looking at several GBs of data (3 to 5GB usually). While someone wardriving wouldn't bother a neighbor with nothing but time might.

    If you have a Mac...and I'm assuming you do...go check out the Kismac tool.

    WPA also has some weaknesses...mainly in the WPA-PSK (pre-shared key) implementation that most home users use. You can do a dictionary attack against the key.

  2. Re:What's wrong with WEP? by amnesiacdotorg · · Score: 4, Informative

    the keys used in WEP are static, not dynamic . sure, 128-bit RC4 is generally secure, but it would be really secure if the key was rotated by the access point . this is done by WPA . WPA is only a placeholder until WPA2 is released, featuring wireless robust authentication protocol and cipher block chaining message authentication code protocol or CCMP.

  3. Re:What's wrong with WEP? by kinnell · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can find a good analysis here.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  4. WPA PSK Dictionary attack by nsayer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not only is there a WPA PSK dictionary attack, it is actually an OFFline dictionary attack - meaning that the attacker can sniff a valid authentication, then take the sniffed data back home and run the dictionary attack on his own without involving the real gatekeeper (who otherwise would see n invalid attempts in a row and have a chance to raise an alarm).

    In general, any scheme where you send a random number to the client, he takes that and adds the secret sauce and sends it back for your comparison is vulnerable to offline dictionary attack.

    The good news is that you can pretty easily trash an offline dictionary attempt by making up a really long and obscure passphrase.

    1. Re:WPA PSK Dictionary attack by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Informative

      I recommend Diceware (http://world.std.com/~reinhold/diceware.html) for generating sorta-memorable passphrases with quantifiable security. A ten-word Diceware passphrase has about 129 bits of entropy.

  5. Can't use WPA with WDS by tackaberry · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you've set up multiple AirPort Extreme Base Stations as a wireless distribution system (WDS) to extend your network, you have to use WEP for security. WPA cannot be used with WDS.

    If you want to use WPA, you'll have to string your base stations together on the lan