Slashdot Mirror


Groklaw Traces Contribution of ABIs back to SCO.

Ptraci writes "Over at Groklaw they have been doing some digging and have found evidence that old SCO and Caldera did in fact contribute those files that they now want to charge us for."

2 of 611 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Groklaw is biased against SCO already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, it would suffice to say that Groklaw is more interested in finding information that would benefit SCO.

    In fact, the entire Linux community is more concerned with finding facts that could help SCO.

    Well, alteast they WERE. The simple fact is, SCO has lied and been caught soooo many times over the last few months... all we can do now is wait for them to lie again so we can disprove it.

    It's simple, SCO has lied and it's a known fact. They've lied a LOT, made a LOT of false allegations, etc al..

    If you bite into a terd, it's going to taste like shit. No amount of suger and spice is going to make it otherwise.

  2. Re:Groklaw is biased against SCO already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This guy brings up a great point. I'm an IT manager at a Fortune 500, and we are considering the ramifications of this case everyday at work.

    Techies - if you want to convince your manager that SCO has no case, stop being so emotional about it. We in management have a hard time trusting your opinion when you seem to have so much invested in this emotionally.

    This is not some battle of good v. evil - you aren't Bilbo fighting that evil eye at the top of the tower (forgot his name, evil wizard guy).