Microsoft, Yahoo Investigate Spam Solution

bllfrnch writes "The NY Times (account required, yada yada) has an article about the suggestion of email postage to stop the advent of spam. Apparently, both Microsoft and Yahoo! support such an initiative, as they are the largest email service providers. Best quote: ''Damn if I will pay postage for my nice list,' said David Farber, a professor at Carnegie Mellon University, who runs a mailing list on technology and policy with 30,000 recipients'."

Comments

Do we need this?

[RT Alec]

Story also posted on C-Net (no account required, yada yada).

What hapened to Yahoo's (as yet unveiled) scheme-to-end-all-schemes for authenticating mail? IMHO, I think that SPF:Sender will make great strides towards combatting spam, combined with new laws that make spoofing illegal. And AOL is backing it, so I think there is a good chance for success, as they are both one of the largest sources of e-mail as well as one of the most commonly spoofed domains.

Mirrors without registration

[digitalvengeance]

Here is a Washington Times summary that doesn't require registration.

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040202-1 23126-8662r.htm

And here is a IHT article which appears to feature the same quote as the NYT article. Same article? I won't register...

http://www.iht.com/articles/127677.html

Josh.

Nope, nope, nope

[ackthpt]

ah... but if spammer x sends a boatload of herbal viagra offers under bob's relay and bob gets a bill... then when they do catch spammer x he can be nabbed under wire fraud laws and be open to all sorts of tasty civil action.

That's naive. You know Ralsky and the like use open relays around the world. He's even contracted some in China. You might tighten a net at best, but eventually you come back to the problem of trying to bill non-USA service providers. Lotsa luck. At best you encourage them to clean up their open relays and implement some decent security, lest their IP traffic be blocked at the border. But this should already be happening. Start locking these things out and they'll get around to fixing things pronto.

No, not simple

[Vainglorious Coward]

Experience has shown that those who say "simply replace SMTP" do not understand the nature of the problem. It's no coincidence that one of the symptoms of being an anti-spam kook is that your solution involves replacing SMTP