Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Chess - 2070 CPUs vs 1 GM

Posted by timothy on from the hitting-all-the-bases dept.

jvarsoke writes "ChessBrain.net broke the world's record for 'largest number of distributed computers used to play a single game' by holding a chess match between Danish GM Peter Heine Nielsen and the equivalent of SETI@home (which similarly, has some people looking for a Mate). 2070 CPU's from 56 countries aided Black by running the chess program Beowulf, including a couple of University clusters. Their supernode ran Linux, and MySQL. The game was relayed by FICS. Results can be viewed here(1) and here(2)."

6 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. Here is mirror of the game :) by doomy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nielsen,P - ChessBrain [E94]
    Guinness record attempt, 30.01.2004
    1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.e4 d6 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.Nf3 0-0 6.Be2 e5 7.0-0 a5 8.Re1 exd4 9.Nxd4 Bd7 10.Bg5 Nc6 11.Nxc6 Bxc6 12.f3 Qd7 13.Qd2 Rfe8 14.Rac1 h5 15.Kh1 Nh7 16.Bh6 Bxh6 17.Qxh6 Re5 18.Nd5 Rae8 19.Qd2 b6 20.Bd3 Qd8 21.Rf1 Nf6 22.b3 Bb7 23.Qc2 Nd7 24.f4 R5e6 25.e5 c6

    --
    ...free your source and the rest would follow...
    1. Re:Here is mirror of the game :) by wan-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

      You're missing the remainder of the game:

      26.f5 gxf5 27.Bxf5 cxd5 28.Bxe6 Rxe6 29.Rxf7 Kxf7 30.Qh7+ Ke8 31.Qxh5+ Ke7 32.Qg5+ Ke8 33.Qh5+ Ke7 34.Qh7+ 1/2-1/2.

  2. Bullshit... by Transient0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is very rare that a common opener played at the GM level results in a discrepancy greater than about a quarter of a pawn. And it takes a great strategic thinker to understand the advantages and disadvantages of all the available branches in the opening against different types of players.

    Of course, it should be obvious that your line of reasoning is totally bogus. The totality of possible moves in chess is simply incomputable and somehow magically trimming this tree to "good" moves still leaves a fundamentally unmemorizable realm of possibilities even at only ten moves depth.

    --
    lysergically yours
    1. Re:Bullshit... by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Informative

      10^120 is the number of possible chess moves. From a google link.

      " If you were to fully develop the entire tree for all possible chess moves, the total number of board positions is about 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
      000,000,000,00 0,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,
      000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00 0,000,00 0,000,
      000,000,000,000, or 10120, give or take a few. That's a very big number. For example, there have only been 1026 nanoseconds since the Big Bang. There are thought to be only 1075 atoms in the entire universe. When you consider that the Milky Way galaxy contains billions of suns, and there are billions of galaxies, you can see that that's a whole lot of atoms. That number is dwarfed by the number of possible chess moves. Chess is a pretty intricate game!"

    2. Re:Bullshit... by product+byproduct · · Score: 5, Informative
      Watch your terminology:
      • The number of chess moves is at most 218.
      • The number of chess positions is estimated to be between 10^43 and 10^50.
      • The number of chess games is infinite, as the 50-move rule and the draw by repetition of position don't apply if no player makes the claim.
      • The game tree complexity is about 10^123. That's the number of chess games you may have to consider to play perfect chess.
      Source: http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess
  3. Re:GM vs. thousands of humans? by sciencewhiz · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are many systems like this. Chessworld.net is one, and they just challenged chessbrain to a match. You can see a full list of chessworld.net's ongoing games here: http://chessworld.net/chessclubs/event_show_chessw orld_summary_rowgames.asp