Cory Doctorow Releases 'Eastern Standard Tribe'

OrenWolf writes "Cory Doctorow (of EFF and Boing Boing fame), has released his second novel, Eastern Standard Tribe today.. it should be showing up in bookstores shortly. As with his earlier work, Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom, Cory has made the whole text of the novel available as a free download "in a variety of open, standards-defined formats, under the terms of a Creative Commons license." Cory also has a writeup "explaining why I've done it: in a nutshell, this worked really well for my first book, and I'd be crazy not to repeat the experiment with my second novel.""

Comments

Re:what about

[superdan2k]

Why don't you do the conversion yourself? Cory merely provides the plaintext version... Other formats are put out by people who aren't lazy enough to whine about the absence of their favorite format.

News?

[pixelgeek]

Is this news or a promotional item for Cory's book?

Is this all it requires to get /. to advertise a product? Release it under the Creative Commons?

Re:News?

[iminplaya]

It also seems to "advertise" a process. So far it appears to be a good thing. Any alternative to the current copyright/patent quagmire that we are in now is good.

Re:News?

[OrenWolf]

Why is this news for /.?

Because it's from an author who, for the second time, is releasing his book under a "some rights reserved" license, for free, and this hasn't hurt past book sales.

Because it's a statement that DRM is *not* required in book sales.

And because it strikes at the heart of so many things /.-ers have been saying forever.. people will buy what they like, people will still be successful in selling a product even while giving away their product for free elsewhere.

Who's to say...

[trickofperspective]

...it worked really well? How can he track the correspondence between downloads and purchases and tell if one directly affected the other? It's hard to even say what those download statistics mean. I know I've downloaded the new book three times now, on multiple PCs, just to take a look at it.

As he points out, he doesn't have a first novel released in a non-e format to compare against. How would you go about deciding the correlation? Maybe if he included a coupon for the paper copy in the e format version?

-Trick

Re:Who's to say...

[FatHogByTheAss]

I think his concern is that his story be read, rather than his story be purchased. As the owner of the copyright to his works, he is free to do with them as he sees fit.

As it should be.

Mmmm logical thought

[Epyn]

This is great, simply because I love it when people realize that consumers are willing to consume if they get what they pay for. I'm more than willing to pay for a book if I decide that I really like it. A reader might never have bought his work if they'd never read some of it online first.

Also, in my opinion its harder to concentrate reading off the screen that it is from a nice high quality 'physical artifact.'

Love the author's work, but...

[Kingstrum]

Why do people still think PDF is an *OPEN* format?

Kingstrum

"I got your Acrobat right here, pal!"

Like CD's/MP3's, or like diamonds

[Space cowboy]

There's an argument that as people listen to downloaded (stolen) MP3's, they'll be tempted to go to the shops and buy them, thus not depriving the shops of their cash or devaluing the commodity. I wonder how books will pan out.

If you could somehow get free diamonds, I doubt many of us would throw them away or buy them instead, (unless you're Dutch)
but with digital "objects" it's a bit more difficult to quantify. Copying is easy, delivery is easy. The sole advantage for the pay-for dead-tree-version is that you can cart it around with you - but with the advent of ever-more-clever phones, PDA's etc., will this advantage disappear, and with it, the open-source book ?

Interesting to see how it pans out...

Simon

Breakout Authors

[subjectstorm]

Putting a book online for free is a great way for any would-be author to get his stuff read massively. It's just not a good way to get paid.

I don't think this is going to adversely affect the publishing industry much in the long run at all. If anything, it will keep it alive and help it to be more effective.

Here's an idea that works out for everybody:

Author Bob writes a book and puts it online. 100,000 people read it. Now they know who he is. A publisher looks at Bob's online work and sees that a lot of people read it. he doesn't have to advertise the guy now - people already know who he is. It takes the guesswork out. Now Bob gets contracted, sells his work instead of giving it away. Bob gets paid.

After a year or 6 months or something, bob releases the book online for free.

In the end, everybody wins. Bob gets paid, the publisher gets paid and saves on advertising and research, and the people can either buy the book or wait an uncomfortable period of time and get it free. most people would probably buy it.

Just an idea.

Creative Commons

[Linus Sixpack]

Its good to see an author re-using the creative commons. I've seen a bit of experiamentation with the license but this is the first author using this license for his _second_ book that I've seen.

Must mean it works for him.

LS

Win Awards

[Nom du Keyboard]

Maybe an author who releases his work like this is improving his chances at relevant awards in his field (due to greater readership). This increases his value as a writer as well.

Maybe awards voters should take into consideration how much an author does to make his work freely available.

enough

[bob dobalina]

Slashdot ought to widen their story filters to allow filtering of "hacks who rip off more successful authors and/or talk about technology while having barely the slightest idea how it actually works". This way I can filter stories by Jon Katz and those submitted by/about Cory Doctorow.