Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

How are System Requirements Determined?

Posted by Cliff on from the picking-numbers-out-of-thin-air dept.

May Kasahara asks: "Seeing as how my Unreal Tournament buddies are considering upgrading to UT2004 soon, I thought I'd check out the system requirements ahead of time. I thought that I'd have no problems, seeing as how UT2004 is mostly just UT2003 with new content, but upon looking up the specs online, I found quite a different story. My PC runs on a 733mHz Pentium III, just meeting the minimum system req.'s for UT2003 (which runs very smoothly on my machine, BTW), but UT2004 requires at least a 1gHz processor for the PC version. Curious, I checked out the UT2003 system specs listed on the official site, and found much the same info-- specs that were quite different from those listed on the retail box in my storage closet. Naturally, I got to thinking about other games and apps, and what I want to know is: what gives? How accurate/trustworthy are system specs listed on a box? Are they artificially inflated to sell more hardware from companies that these publishers are affiliated with (nVidia in UT's case), or is there a more logical explanation?"

2 of 113 comments (clear)

  1. Re:simple by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    No, the simplest explanation is that hardly any gamers have processors under 1Ghz, and any game claiming to run on 500MHz or above will be perceived as "old" and "not worth the money" because it doesn't use the capabilities of modern systems.

    --
    ...
  2. There's also QA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A big factor for determining what companies will support is the time+cost involved in QA.

    For example, for a game, some QA dude would have to sit down and play the game all the way through on the "minimum" system just to verify that it works. After trudging through on a 1Ghz system, they probably just didn't feel like it was worth the time to test it on a 800Mhz system or whatever.

    For something like MS Windows, there's a vast array of hardware that needs to be tested, and they can save significant amounts of money by obsoleting a generation or two of hardware. Win2000 came with a bunch of "unsupported" Pentium-era SCSI drivers, and WinXP basically dropped anything that was common before the PII days.