Moving Net Control From ICANN to Governments?
a whoabot writes "The BBC has a piece by Bill Thompson suggesting that "control" of the internet should move away from corporate groups(ICANN and the Web Consortium) and to governments. We previously had an article on ICANN and the UN World Summit on the Information Society. One quote: "We allow images of consensual sex in our cinemas, but not images of bestiality or child abuse. Why should the net be any different?" My personal answer: because the internet should not be another TV or cinema, it should be a free, user-as-peer and user-controllable media; a "reversible" media, as Baudrillard would put it; not user-as-consumer."
or if not possible, any Scandinavian country. They have a very good culture of privacy. Plus nobody will ever tell the Swiss what to do or bomb them because everyone has their money there.
Jesus Christ people, if you hang your free speech arguments on the right to show videos of daddy fucking a dog, you will lose those rights.
This is my sig.
Duh! They have, its called the Internet.
omg lolzor i m n my parentz bassmint 2! onlee i have onleee one celeryon but it is superpooperclocked to 666 mangahurts!!!!!!! and im a loneleee 44 yr old man 2!!!!!
want 2 cyber????
Sorry, but some women do have cocks.
Oh come on! Vain? There are only *two* pictures of him in each article now! There used to be three.
Gee, that's the last time my dogs come to a sleepover at your house.
Result: the MTU will increase from 1460 bytes to 1.46 GB, and the quickest way of reading a foreign website will be air travel.
that's right, touch Sealand and we'll be in Washington by sun-up. The English
sig under development
Is it any wonder that Slashdot's bid for the ICANN contract was rejected?
Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/