Slashdot Mirror


California Man Sues Penis-Enlargment Firms

Ronin writes "The DenverPost reports that 'A California man on Thursday sued a slew of international companies, including a Greeley distributor, alleging the penis-enlargement products they market and distribute do not work.' One of the highlights of the article is when the man says "I was wondering for a long time why no one has gotten around to suing these penis-enlargement guys, because it seems like a pretty blatant ... fraud." Probably cause people are too embarrased to say they've tried it."

17 of 733 comments (clear)

  1. Doesn't work by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These things prey on people's desperation and feelings of inadequacy. I mean really, even a tiny dude can score if his head game is good.

    1. Re:Doesn't work by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think that the most obvious reason to believe that they don't work is the fact that you don't see them in every store in the USA. Let's face it... if they worked, they'd probably be selling better than crack.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    2. Re:Doesn't work by JPriest · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is about time someone went after spammers for false advertisement. If the spammers want to claim that spam is a legit method of marketing than thay can be subject to the same rules and regulations as any other advratisement media.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    3. Re:Doesn't work by Endive4Ever · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's good to see examples of the fear of inadequacy right here in the discussion threads.

      --
      ---
    4. Re:Doesn't work by TRACK-YOUR-POSITION · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, isn't that what all human progress is based on?

  2. Re:A new front against Spam by Uber+Banker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It may be hard to track down the spammers advertising it (and prove a link between them and the retailer) but it is hell-of-easy tracking down the retailer when they accept payments on Visa/Mastercard.

  3. Re:Denver or California? by ikewillis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's fairly clear from the article he's a California man suing a Greely, CO firm in Denver, CO, most likely because it's an interstate matter. Greeley is in Weld county... one would assume the suit would take place in the county seat (which I believe is Greeley)... but I don't really know too much in matters of interstate law. Perhaps one of the sides requested a change of venue...

  4. The idiot problem... by Psychor · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've always been pretty amazed that companies marketing such blatantly fake products actually manage to sell anything, especially things like penis-enlargement pills. These are typically advertised through email with poor spelling, worse grammar, and appear written by someone who manages to produce documents using poorer English than a bad Babelfish translation.

    It appears to me that people who are stupid (and insecure, but mainly just stupid) enough to buy these products seem for some reason unable to resist the persuasive tactics of modern marketing. Surely logically, the demographic spending money on such obviously fake products must waste vast amount of money on anything which appears in a slick television commercial, created by intelligent advertising execs who can speak English.

    I suspect that even if penis enlargement pills and suchlike are taken off the market, those that will buy such products will simply spend their money on something else that they neither really want nor need (diet pills, viagra, naked teens in their email etc.) Although the advertisers are clearly doing wrong in this case, and suing them is a good course of action, this may not really help matter in the long term. There have always been products on the market whose effectiveness is dubious at best, and are often even harmful, yet some people clearly continue to purchase them. Perhaps the answer could be stricter controls over what products are allowed to be advertised at all. The crazy extreme alternative of course, is to take money away from the stupid people, but with adverts for personal loans and debt consolidation every five minutes during our mind-numbing daytime TV schedules, it seems unlikely that this will happen any time soon.

    Food for thought, in any case.

  5. Why Englargment Pills Sell Despite Not Working by $criptah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From a social engineering point of view, selling penis enlargement pills can bring a very limited amount of loss. Just imagine, you are a guy who is concerned about his manhood. You buy tons of expensive pills to find out that none of them work. Would you advertise it to the rest of the world? Would you have enough balls to tell a sweet young lady on the other side of the phone that your penis is still small despite that four hundred dollars that you have spent in the past six months? Probably not.

    Additionally, you cannot argue when it comes to shady products such as penis enlargement and dieting pills. Usually when you get those items, you get many disclosures that state "Not approved by FDA" and "results may vary." How are you going to argue against that? If you do not believe me, go to any GNC store and get a bottle of any *magic* pills that promise to turn you into a pro-bodybuilder with an eleven-inch manhood. Then read what it says on the bottle... then, if you dare, go and use it. Then go and complain about your results if you find them to be unsatisfactory. At best, everybody is going to laugh at you.

  6. Re:Damn !! by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Rich white criminals don't land in pound-me-in-the-ass prisons.

    America's judicial system may be better than a lot of systems around the world, but neither is it free of corruptino.

  7. Re:Penis enlargement blog by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, uh-huh. So who is this lucky dick anyway? From the "About Me" page, he's a regular working stiff from NYC who you can reach by email at thepill3@lycos.com. No name, as far as I can tell.

    So, yeah, if you want to beleive a bunch of absolutely unverifiable crap from "thepill3@lycos.com", then yeah, I suppose it might be interesting. At least he provides lots of links to suppliers.

    --
    No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
  8. Read the fine print by ThisIsFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A lot of these junk products remain legal because they very narrowly escape making outright false claims. My local radio stations are currently inundated with "star registry" commercials in time for V-day. The particular company claims that "the star name is registered in book form in the U.S. Copyright Office." Very clever. Name-dropping a government agency gives their claim an appearance of legitimacy, when in fact all they are doing is taking your $50 and writing down someone's name in a book. Hell, I can do that for $25. Another product claims to regrow hair, and "is so effective that it was awarded a patent." The truth, of course, is that a patent only says a particular party has claim to an idea or method, not that the idea or method actually does something useful.

    My personal favorites are the suggested-physician scam products. These companies try to suggest that a doctor is/was involved with the product, and we are supposed to make the mental leap that this means the product has been proven to work through rigorous medical trials. The cheapest scammers use the words "doctor" or "physician" in the product name. Next are the doctors that speak to you on television, but hold a doctorate in some totally unrelated field (most likely business). Some of these guys manage to get a real M.D., but he only says something like "I use it", or perhaps "it worked for me", which really isn't making any legally-binding promises.

    But, scammers can claim damn near anything they want, as long as they can make you keep it for [at most] 30 days, they have your money and you can't do a thing about it. (I love it when they claim a 60 or 90 day "guaranteed" refund -- as if they are required by law to honor that) The only thing the scammers have to worry about is if the product hurts you, so it's in their best interest that the product does nothing at all.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  9. What a jack ass by glenebob · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "I now feel that I have been cheated out of my money by the sellers of the products. If possible, I would like to prevent the sellers of the products from cheating others as they have cheated me."
    The rest of us feel cheated out of our inboxes thanks to jack asses like yourself who make spamming profitable.

    We also feel cheated out of a useful legal system because of sue-happy jack asses such as yourself.

    This guy is a real treasure.

  10. Is this really Expanding a Geeks Head..? by Ziggilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is this really Expanding a Geeks Head..? No pun intended..(ok, yes it is..)) Being a faithful follower & reader of '/.' , this subject here just don't feel right. Is this is a place for 'News for Nerds / Stuff that Matters' or a place for 'Fiends w/ little Wienies / Stuff that Splatters'. Times a changin'~..

  11. Here's what I don't understand by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Even the ones hawking these things tell you that the average size for a human is something like 6.1 inches. And that the vast majority of humans have "only" that size.

    So basically guess what? Anyone who "only" has 6 inches -- or is within, say, +/- 10% of that -- is just a perfectly normal member of the human species.

    Why, in Odin's name, would anyone feel desperate and inadequate for being perfectly normal? WTH? Since when it's inadequate to _not_ be a mutant?

    I mean, what next? Spam for pills to grow a 6'th finger on your hands? Or to grow an elephant trunk instead of a nose? Or to grow a giraffe neck?

    The whole thing seems stupid beyond belief to me.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Here's what I don't understand by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I believe the appropriate reponse might contain the comment, "Karma is a bitch." When Jane Mansfield and Marilyn Monroe were popular in the 50's, women were faced with unrealistic expectations -- and have had cope with lower self-esteem and in some cases increased health risks (implants). Nowadays crap like Sex in the City and Coupling tell guys they will simply not be memorable lovers if they're aren't donkies. Never mind technique. Never mind that most normal women do have an upper bound on "comfortable" size that likely isn't that much larger then the guy in question. No, if you're going to satisfy your woman, you've got to split her in half.

      Ask yourself how many guys would want to date a woman based on her breast size? That's probably a similar number to how many women would go for a larger guy. Now, think about that first number, and subtract how many guys could still have a happy relationship with a woman regardless of her chest?

      In other words, Yes, women care, a few more than others, but not so many that it's causing you to lose potential dates. There are probably other factors that rank far higher (spending all your time on /., for instance).

  12. Two Bad Internet Jokes by salesgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've often wondered why the internet is fascinated by:

    * Getting a larger penis
    * Using chemical pheremones to motivate the opposite sex
    * Porn

    Then I remembered that the internet is was created by geeks for geeks and funded by a government that knows that large numbers bored smart people would eventually get tired of large numbers of stupid people making the rules.

    --
    -- $G