Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

A Bunch Of XML Recommendations

Posted by Hemos on from the go-forth-and-implement dept.

KjetilK writes "During the past couple of days, the World Wide Web Consortium, have advanced several core XML-specifications to Recommendations. You have the Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.1 and Namespaces in XML 1.1 as well as XML 1.0 Third Edition. In addition, XML Infoset Second Edition is now a Recommendation and VoiceXML 2.0 is now Proposed Recommendation."

3 of 22 comments (clear)

  1. My recommendation by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny


    use csv

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:My recommendation by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, c'mon you've got to be at least 3 meta levels above that if you want to be taken seriously by the w3!

  2. We don't need no stinkin' 1.1 by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't see why I need XML 1.1. I've been doing markup in Mongolian for ages:

    <?xml version="1.1" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <&#4632;&#4925;&#4624;&#4939;>
    <&#4768;&#4653;&#4773;&#4661;&#4725;>&#4840;&#46 35;&#4724;&#4814;&#4656; &#4808;&#4757;&#4876;&#4621;</&#4768;&#4653;&#4773 ;&#4661;&#4725;>
    <&#4637;&#4821;&#4651;&#4939;&nb sp; &#4812;&#4901;&#4653;="&#4969;">
    <&#4768;&#4653;& #4773;&#4661;&#4725;>&#4840;&#4770;&#4840;&#4657;& #4656; &#4840;&#4725;&#4813; &#4621;&#4853; &#4624;&#4648;&#4877;</&#4768;&#4653;&#4773;&#4661 ;&#4725;>
    <&#4708;&#4725; &#4812;&#4901;&#4653;="&#4969;">
    &nbsp ; &#4840;&#4851;&#4810;&#4725; &#4621;&#4869;&#4963; &#4840;&#4768;&#4776;&#4653;&#4611;&#4637; &#4621;&#4869; &#4840;&#4609; &#4752;&#4813; &#4840;&#4770;&#4840;&#4657;&#4656 ; &#4776;&#4653;&#4656;&#4726;&#4656 ; &#4840;&#4725;&#4813; &#4621;&#4853; &#4624;&#4648;&#4877; &#4840;&#4634;&#4776;&#4720;&#4616;&#4813;&nbs p; &#4752;&#4813;&#4964;
    </&#4708;&#4725;>
    <&#4708; &#4725; &#4812;&#4901;&#4653;="&#4970;">
    &#4768;&#4776;&# 4653;&#4611;&#4637; &#4845;&#4656;&#4624;&#4677;&#4752 ; &#4808;&#4616;&#4848;&#4964;

    &#4845;&#4656;&#46 24;&#4677; &#4843;&#4821;&#4678;&#4709;&#4752 ; &#4808;&#4616;&#4848;&#4964;

    &#4843;&#4821;&#46 78;&#4709; &#4845;&#4609;&#4851;&#4752;&#4755 ; &#4808;&#4752;&#4853;&#4638;&#4729;&#4752; &#4808;&#4616;&#4848;&#4964;

    </&#4708;&#4725;>
    </&#4637;&#4821;&#4651;&#4939;>
    </&#4632;&#4925; &#4624;&#4939;>

    Sheesh, really.

    Well, the only thing I haven't been able to figure out is why they did that thing with the NEL or whatever weird carriage return marker.