What If Dark Matter Really Doesn't Exist?

sonar67 writes "According to The Economist: 'It was beautiful, complex and wrong. In 150AD, Ptolemy of Alexandria published his theory of epicycles--the idea that the moon, the sun and the planets moved in circles which were moving in circles which were moving in circles around the Earth. This theory explained the motion of celestial objects to an astonishing degree of precision. It was, however, what computer programmers call a kludge: a dirty, inelegant solution. Some 1,500 years later, Johannes Kepler, a German astronomer, replaced the whole complex edifice with three simple laws. Some people think modern astronomy is based on a kludge similar to Ptolemy's. At the moment, the received wisdom is that the obvious stuff in the universe--stars, planets, gas clouds and so on--is actually only 4% of its total content. About another quarter is so-called cold, dark matter, which is made of different particles from the familiar sort of matter, and can interact with the latter only via gravity. The remaining 70% is even stranger. It is known as dark energy, and acts to push the universe apart. However, the existence of cold, dark matter and dark energy has to be inferred from their effects on the visible, familiar stuff. If something else is actually causing those effects, the whole theoretical edifice would come crashing down.'"

Comments

There's a lot of dark matter...

[Trolling4Dollars]

...mostly around Uranus. And remember... Uranus is a gas giant.

Dark matter and the SCO Group

[haaz]

I think the theory that "dark" matter is holding the universe together (and apart) is a lot like SCO's claims: lots of puffed up hyperbole that sounds good until examined closely.

Perhaps then it is this alleged dark energy that Darl and co. are trying to use to thwart Linux?