A New Face For Robotics

tanmay writes "Android technology has moved a step forward with the creation of a high-tech polymer called 'f'rubber,' which resembles human skin. Its creator, David Hanson has implemented it in a robot called Hertz, as this report from CNN gives us the details. Another question that the report brings up is the need to make robots resemble humans. Ray Kurzweil thinks Hanson's work is significant because realistic facial movement will play an important role in the way future androids respond to humans, and has the following to say, 'Intelligence significantly below that of normal humans stands out more with a robot that looks strikingly human. This creates the impression of a human with impaired intelligence, which may strike some as disturbing.'"

Comments

Perhaps they shouldn't try so hart to be human...

[Dr. Zowie]

Things that look too human appear grotesque and disturbing, unless they're dead-nuts-on. Apparently there's an uncanny valley in parameter space, where things that are close to (but not exactly) human are disturbing and grotesque.

New Scientist recently covered this as well

[another misanthrope]

full text here: Follow that human


"Most people doing social robots believe that human faces will turn people off and will disturb them. I think that's ridiculous," Hanson said. "The human face is perhaps the most natural paradigm for us to interact with."

Most experts disagree. They cite one of the principles of social robotics, the so-called "Uncanny Valley" theory.

First described by pioneering Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori, the theory goes like this: humans have a positive psychological reaction to robots that look somewhat like humans. But if a robot is made to look very realistic but somehow isn't quite right (it has an odd smile, or it doesn't blink, for example) it seems grotesque instead of comforting.

Astro Boy, Ahoy!

[StefanJ]

My parents told me a while back that I was a rabid "Astro Boy"* fan when I was a wee tot. (A translated version of the cartoon played in the 'States in the late 60s.)

I barely remembered the show . . . but was curious enough after the 50th Anniversary noise last year to pick up the first volume of the collected comics. (I think Dark Horse is publishing them.)

The B&W art was very stylish and lively, but the stories were kind of juvenile.

One thing stood out**: In the beginning of the Origin Story, we're shown a brief history of robotics. The big breakthrough that made robots acceptable in everyday life:

Lifelike rubber skin!

Stefan

* Yeah, yeah, his real name is "Mighty Atom."

** Well, one other thing stood out. Astro Boy had a machine gun in his butt. Man, that's freaky.

PopSci article

[FiloEleven]

Popular Science has a longer (and IMO better) article on the entire project. It was written September 2003. It's got interesting information on the "Uncanny Valley" -- robots are okay, unless they look very much but not quite human - they call it "walking corpse." Hanson hopes to get past that valley and build (at least) a head that is a perfect human imitation.

Heard Ray speak last week

[tundog]

He gave 2-hour talk about the relationship between innovation, AI and biotech.

The coolest part was that his talk was a virtual talk - he was sitting at his office in Boston and was beamed over to a conference hall with ~2000 people. They had this curtain setup with a translucent concave reception dish that caught a projected video signal - I swear to god, from the back of the room, the only way that you knew he was a hologram and not a real person was that he was 'brighter' than the guy next to him. Even better, was that they had this camera that projected the people speaking onto a huge screen auditorium-type display and when you looked at that there was no way to tell that he wasn't physically there. The only thing that gave him away was the occasionally interrupted audio (must have been VOIP). I don't know if the video signal was analog or digital but I suppose it could have been either.

The core of his talk was that science in general (and machine AI in particular) is advancing 'exponentially' - that each new innovation provides us with new tools to accelerate progress. Cool shizzle. According to him, we'll see some incredible advances in the next 10 years.

A door is ajar

[wowbagger]

Part of the annoyance was the lack of information - "Door ajar. Door ajar."

OK, which fscking door is it?!?

Also, this would start the instant the door was opened with the key in place. Had it dinged a couple of times first, then said "Driver's door ajar" or "Front right door ajar" (or for you who drive on the wrong side of the road, "Front left door ajar" ;) then it might not have been quite so annoying.

Re:To paraphrase another Robin Williams film

[AKAImBatman]

Bzzt! The Nutty Professor was a Jerry Lewis movie where he tried to impress a girl with a formula that made him handsome. (In the end, his mom ended up selling the formula after he decided to destroy it.) It was subject to a remake by Eddie Murphy who did a good job at destroying it.

The original "Flubber" movie was called "The Absent Minded Professor". I should know. My parents always called my by that name to poke at my absent mindedness. :-/

this is a JOKE

[feelyoda]

The effort to make robots more human is funny. I'm laughing.

Anyone who has ever interacted with any robot, regardless of scale of the project, resemblance to humans, or application, can tell you that robots are STUPID.

Life-like faces are the last thing they need. Learning a language, learning how to walk on their own, object recognition, simultaneous localization and mapping, gripping, etc. are all in a pathetic state compared to what you read in CNN.

I mean, this is why I'm in the field: to improve it. But don't get your hopes up for this decade (and probably the next).