Robot Stories Movie
Ant writes "One line synopsis -- Winner of over 23 awards, 'Robot Stories' is science fiction from the heart, four stories in which utterly human characters struggle to connect in a world of robot babies, robot toys, android office workers, and digital immortality." There are a few reviews available.
Independent movie producers like this with their limited movie release schedules must hit Netflix style distributers early.
Much as I would like to see these movies, I am not willing to fly to some other city just to watch a movie.
I hope they make it to Netflix or something similar so that I can support them then.
I like the quote on the front page:
Translation: "If, during the wine and cheese portion of the dinner party, Kaitlyn and Rog look at you askance when you mention you went to see a movie called 'Robot Stories' down at the Brattle House Theatre last weekend, here are some literary / retropopcult names you can drop to reassure them of your continued hipness. Don't forget to contrast them with George Lucas, chief purveyor of the kind of mass-culture pablum they show on the SciFi channel, which you are so obviously and hiply above"
Not that there's anything WRONG with that. The more exposure scifi gets in different subdivisions of pop culture, the better. We need more people to start thinking seriously and honestly about our future, given how rapidly it seems to be approaching.
In other words, the writer is positing by the phrase "utterly human" is that in a world where machines are becoming more human, humans can't meet them half way. We are what we are, that is to say human nature is fixed. However, the situations in which we find ourselves, particularly due to technology, are constantly changing and hilighting different aspects of human nature.
Which is why technology is an appropriate topic for artists to be interested in.
Notes to usage nazis on
(1) Slashdot is more of a cafe atmosphere than a journal. While we the readers appreciate effort in composition, a relaxed and tolerant attitude towards usage and spelling is appropriate. Rampant pedantry is one of the reasons I stopped reading K5. Yes I realize this post is pedantic, but I don't believe in unilateral disarmament.
(2) This is a instance of a common usageanarian nitpick: the application of adverbs to adjectives indicating class membership. The laws of Aristotlean logic don't apply to natural language, because the law of the excluded middle is false. The degree to which adjectives embodying abstract concepts like "good" or "human" apply to a real world thing is not fixed at absolute truth or falsity. It is almost always fuzzy. For that reason it is entirely appropriate to apply adverbs such as "utterly" to adjectives such as "human" which on their own would indicate class membership.
(3) If you are going to get on your usageanarian high horse, you should pay attention to spelling, usage and capitalization in your own posts.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
I spoke with the director about the way some webcomics and other online media outlets were giving away content to make $$$. For instance, I bought the Small Stories book, even though I'd already read Same Difference for free online. I thought giving away one of the vignettes from the website would be a do-able notion (especially with advance promtion somewhere like /., followed with a Bit Torrent to ease his bandwidth bills), which could then fuel direct DVD sales of some kind.
Bottom line, if this comes by you, see it! I can't believe a movie like this has been making the festival rounds for so long and has not been picked up by a cable outlet or some type of distributor. Heck, if SciFi has money to waste on some of its crap-tacular originals, I'm sure it has the money to buy up something this small-scale. Maybe a grass-roots geek agitation could help this deserving flick out!