Slashdot Mirror


FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 Released

Dan writes "FreeBSD Release Engg. Team's Scott Long has announced the second release candidate of FreeBSD 5.2.1. The release is now available for downloading. Please test and provide feedback. Changes since the RC1 include more bug fixes for ATA, working kernel modules on the install floppies, and numerous security fixes to the src and XFree86 packages. Note that the sparc64 XFree86-4-Server package in this set does not have the latest updates, Scott says that this will be fixed in the final release."

7 of 61 comments (clear)

  1. FP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Eat my smelly brown shit!

  2. Sux0rs Status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    In a startling turn of events today, a previously little-known fact came into the public eye: "*BSD Sux0rs". This came as a complete surprise to the BUWLA, or BSD Users With Large Assholes, as they previously thought that *BSD 0wned.
    "You see, even though I have never contributed code to any BSD project, I thought it was my duty to be a big asshole to others which don't use the OS I do, because it just 0wnz.", said one FreeBSD user. "Now that I know it sux0rs, though, I have to go find something else to be an asshole about."

    One notorious OpenBSD fanatic known as WideOpen, told reporters, "I have to kill myself. This isn't how it was supposed to happen. My BSD has always been the best, and shouting that opinion in other people's faces at every chance I got has been my only hobby. It was all I ever did. It was what got me out of bed in the morning. Now I have to die. I will jam my bedpost up my ass until I hit my brain. It is the only way to go: BSD style."

    In the volatile world of operating systems anything can happen. "At least we don't sux0r as much as Windows users", BigAzz, a relatively well-known NetBSD user said. "Screaming things in people's faces is my calling. Now I need to scream that BSD sux0rs. What a sad world. At least I won't kill myself like those uber-asshole OpenBSD guys. They are just way over the top. Or were, at least."

    Nobody knows for sure what the future holds for the state of operating systems, but with Netcraft confirming the sux0r status, *BSD users all over the world will have to stick something else up their asses from now on or risk looking even more gay than they used to.

  3. BSD: What I know about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    1. You can not play games on it.
    2. It cannot be used by my grandma.
    3. It lacks a GUI of any note.
    4. There is no support available for it.
    5. It is an assortment of fragmented OSes.
    6. It cannot be run on the x86 platform.
    7. You have to compile everything and know C.
    8. Support for the latest hardware is always poor.
    9. It is incompatiable with GNU/Linux.
    10.It is dying.

  4. THERE'S AN ADDENDUM TO THE ANNOUNCEMENT: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It is official; Netcraft confirms: *BSD is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers. The sudden and unpleasant departures of long time FreeBSD developers Jordan Hubbard and Mike Smith only serve to underscore the point more clearly. There can no longer be any doubt: FreeBSD is dying.

    Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.

    OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.

    Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.

    All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dbblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.

    Fact: *BSD is dying

  5. Re:Anyone got a torrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I didn't know corpses could run.

  6. Thoughts on the release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic



    What exactly is FreeBSD releasing?

    The situation is pretty complex. The body is an assemblage of assorted nutrient media substrata (meat, blood, fat, brain and other weirder tissues) that are favored by one or another means of decomposition and microorganisms. The questions are:

    1) Which means of decomposition will occur?

    2) How soon do the agents of decomposition get to the substrate?

    3) How fast will they work?

    4) What will be their effects?

    Some background: The most common pathways to decomposition include biochemical agents (microbes) and biomechanical agents (insects, predators). Under normal conditions, you need one or more of these to take place. The body is made up of tissues, which are in turn made up of cells. The cells need food, water, and oxygen to stay alive. When these stop, the cell dies (goes into necrosis, euphemistically speaking). Necrotic cells ordinarily retain their integrity for some time, until something breaches the cell membrane or until dehydration causes collapse. Biochemical agents (bacteria) usually do not get to the contents of a necrotic cell until it has been breached.

    So, to conclude, we can expect the following release from FreeBSD. Firstly, the front of the body will swell, the tongue may protrude and fluid from the lungs will ooze out of the mouth and nostrils. This unpleasant sight is added to by a terrible smell as gases such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide, methane, mercaptans, cadaverine and putrescine are released.

    Hope this helps.

  7. Re:I like freeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    dead bodies are usually cleaned before burial

    simple? I disagree. the embalmbing process can be a bit tricky at times

    useful? yes I agree. necrophilia can be the best sex ever