Slashdot Mirror


AMD Back in the Black

XaXXon writes "CNN reports that AMD had a profitable quarter for the first time in over two years. According to the story this is mostly because of their 64-bit line of chips (both Opterons and Athlon-64). AMD has forced both HP and Intel to change long-standing plans of only supporting Itanium, with HP coming out with Opteron-based systems and Intel releasing chips mimicking the 32/64-bit behaviour of the Opteron. According to the story, 64-bit processors are better than 32-bit ones because 32-bit processors 'can't take advantage of more than 4 megabytes (sic) of memory at a time.'"

6 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. 32, 64,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What I want to know is, where are the 128bit CPUs?

    1. Re:32, 64,... by MasTRE · · Score: 4, Funny

      > What I want to know is, where are the 128bit CPUs?

      Which will be able to address..... [zoom in on Dr. Evil's face] 1 MILLION MEGABYTES!!!

      --
      Must-not-watch TV!
  2. Thanks for clearing that up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you also explain jokes to people after you tell them?

  3. The metric system can only simplify things so much by MukiMuki · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, the DVD consortium has finally approved a standard of blue ray disc drive, which allows optical media to break DVD's 18 megabyte barrier, finally allowing for movies times exceeding 10 seconds.

  4. Irony by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 5, Funny

    "and Intel releasing chips mimicking the 32/64-bit behaviour of the Opteron"

    Does anybody else see the irony in this ?

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  5. Re:AMD have been better than Intel for some time.. by dave420-2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Using terms like "versatile" and "nimble" to describe a CPU makes me slightly wary of the rest of your point ;) What's next, "majestic" RAM? "enigmatic" GPUs? :-P