Slashdot Mirror


Sonic-powered Mosquito Larvae Eliminator

Bob Vila's Hammer writes "Inventor Michael Nyberg, at the age of 15, developed the idea for a mosquito larvae eradicator after hearing about rising cases of West Nile virus. His company, Larvasonic, has developed these devices. They utilize sonic blasts at certain frequency that rupture the breathing sacs of the larvae, killing them instantly. Remarkably, it does not harm other insects and it is considered a very effective means of destroying problematic mosquito infestations."

11 of 76 comments (clear)

  1. Great Idea! Let's go for it! by no+longer+myself · · Score: 4, Funny
    We should put these things into mass production, stategically place them throughout the entire world, then eraticate the entire mosquito population and make them go the way of the carrier pigeon.

    OK, so I sound a little hateful, but I'm tired of being under them on the food chain. It hurts my self-esteem. (What's left of it anyway...)

    1. Re:Great Idea! Let's go for it! by lcde · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just as a side note.... won't this eraticate the dragon fly population. Their larvae eat mosquito larvae...

      --
      :%s/teh/the/g
  2. Re:it doesn't kill other insects by tetrode · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Many other animals supposedly live under water, although I can't name one right now.

    Ehh, Fish?

  3. Breeding Resistance by justanyone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hey:

    I'm wondering if this would just breed resistance to having body parts susceptible to sonic disruption. After all, mosquitoes breed in incredibly large numbers, so in very few generations, resistance to this should develop.

    Don't get me wrong, I like the idea of "Better Living Thru No Chemicals" (tm) (grin) but I just see this thing as flawed in its longevity given the natural forces at work.

    How much does ultrasonic propogate through water? These larvae are in water, right? So, the larvae that are on the surface are killed (which is most of them if memory serves about how their life cycle works). But, what about the ones slightly below the surface? And even farther? They get less of a sonic dose, and are bred for resistance.

    This is the same kind of thing that's being done with lysteria and myriad other diseases/organisms by administering antibiotics in small doses to cattle / other livestock. We're breeding for better organisms that will evade our better efforts.

    Good job, though, and hearty thanks to the 15 year old.

    I might suggest people build more bat houses, though. Bats are known to eat half their weight in insects, mostly skeeters, per NIGHT. Note: I think skeeters must be high fiber (grin) or this would be really filling (!!!).

    I have a bat house; we just moved, and I'm going to reinstall it at our new house. They're like birdhouses, but specific to bats (whose natural habitat, rotting trees and caves, are very scarce in suburbia). Contrary to popular opinion, bats don't carry disease readily because they're rather fragile creatures, they just die and people find them, think they're the disease carriers instead of the victims. Bats are actually very, very useful, and really harmless creatures. Give them a home, I say, and get rid of the skeeters that way.

    Evolutionary pressures have been balancing out this predator / prey for a long time.

    1. Re:Breeding Resistance by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can't stop evolution from happening, though it doesn't look like mosquitoes will develop a resistance to bats anytime soon...

      This is because bats prey on the fundamental design of a mosquito: they can move faster, think faster, sense faster. Developing a resistance to bats will require a change in the entire organism.

      I think there is a similar case in the vulnerability of their breathing sacs. This is a rather fundamental organ of the mosquito, and expecting it to change very rapidly is unreasonable. This is not just some chemical resistance, but an inherent physical vulnerability. They may evolve thicker breathing sacs, but this is a flaw in the fundamental structure of the breathing sac and cannot be changed quickly. Thus, correcting this defect won't happen over a few generations.

    2. Re:Breeding Resistance by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm all for bat houses, but make sure you place it strategically so that your kids dont play near/with the bat guano. It can be toxic due to fungus/microorganisms contained in it.

      It makes good fertilizer tho.

    3. Re:Breeding Resistance by vadius · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm wondering if this would just breed resistance to having body parts susceptible to sonic disruption.

      I bet on Mosquito Slashdot they are thinking, if we started killing humans by ripping out their lungs, maybe in a few generations they might develop a resistance to lung removal.

      Yeah Evolution!

  4. His patent by Lady+Jazzica · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's his patent for this invention:
    Patent 6,298,011: Method for killing mosquito larvae

    A short excerpt:

    "Mosquito larvae have internal organs which contain various structures, including a small air bladder. All structures have acoustic resonance, especially underwater bubbles. Since larvae tissues are fragile, simply matching the acoustic resonance of the air bladder causes acute trauma and embolism resulting in death of the mosquito larvae.

    Thus, referring to FIG. 1, an acoustic transducer is immersed in a body of water which is a habitat for mosquito larvae. A depth of immersion of only a few inches is required, as shown in FIG. 1. One or more transducer is preferably connected to an amplifier which in turn is connected to a signal generator for generating a resonant frequency within an octave range ranging from 16 kHz to 32 kHz. The transducer immersed in water is energized for a short period of time. The resultant acoustic resonance resonates with the air bladder of the mosquito larvae, causing it to traumatize surrounding tissue and causes the air bubble to migrate from the thorax of the mosquito through the abdomen, resulting in death to the larvae. An effective resonant frequency is from 16 kHz to 32 kHz, and less than one watt of energy is necessary to start the process. A larger signal generator would be necessary to cover a larger body of water with rapid coverage, or the unit could be effectively moved to various locations in the body of water."

  5. Too bad the mosquitos themself are part of... by Compunerd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the biotope. Several places they've tried fiddling with nature to stop plagues, like in denmark, they spilt chemicals on small lakes to stop the mosquitos from sitting on it, drowning them instead. What happened? Small birds were dying, not having enough food. Also, in denmark, they tried to stop birds eating their apples from apple farms, pulling huge nets and shooting birds approaching, discovering the birds really didn't like apple, but the bugs inside them, resulting in a great production loss. And - also - a friend of mine is doing a lot of parachute jumping. They found out that the barn swallow living in the hangar were shitting on their chutes, and started to shoot the birds, resulting in a vast amount of flies and mosquitos etc etc etc.
    Perhaps not fiddle with nature after all?

    roy

    --
    Computers are like air conditioners.
    - They stop working when you open Windows.
  6. Re:it doesn't kill other insects by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are you suggesting this might also kill Dog Eggs?

    Oh my!

  7. Cool by presearch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I caught Larvasonic last summer, those guys rock.