Slashdot Mirror


Oldest Fossilised Winged Insect Yet Discovered

tr0llb4rt0 writes "The Scientific American reports on an article in Nature (paid subscription required for full text) on how the fossilised mouth parts of an insect discovered in Scotland in 1928 has turned out to be the oldest winged insect yet discovered, pushing back the age of the earliest appearance of winged insects nearly 80 million years. Previos fossils of winged insects have dated to around 330 million years and scientist believe this new discovery lived between 408 and 438 million years ago. "

24 comments

  1. Oldest bug found. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, it was infesting someone's Windows 3.11 system.

    1. Re:Oldest bug found. by man_ls · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I thought it got jammed in a relay :(

    2. Re:Oldest bug found. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run Windows 3.11 you insensitive clod!

  2. [Troll]Help Me Nerds! by Captain+Goatse · · Score: -1

    Hi i want to allocate memory for an array of pointer to a class, with an int i would do :

    int *i = new int[iMyValue];
    i[0] = 10;
    i[1] = 5;

    etc etc

    However this technique does not seem to work with my classes :

    class MyClass;

    MyClass *hello = new MyClass[iMyValue];

    hello[0] = new MyClass;
    hello[1] = new MyClass;

    etc etc

    So I want a dynamic array of pointer to MyClass. Whats the best way to do this?

    Cheers

    1. Re:[Troll]Help Me Nerds! by schapman · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      just make an STL list or vector; include stl library dynListOfPointers = new list(); dynListOfPointers.add(new MyClass()); done. :P

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    2. Re:[Troll]Help Me Nerds! by stuffduff · · Score: -1, Offtopic
      I suggest that you try Google Groups. Every question asked on usenet...and all the answers they got.

      Good Luck!

      --
      "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  3. I fail to see how this is news by ArmorFiend · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hm, only 8 comments - maybe nobody's interested because its a boring dead bug.

    I found a small pile of tan dust with two fly wings on top in my mini-tower the other day, but *I* didn't submit it.

    1. Re:I fail to see how this is news by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Well, of course not. Then your mum would know that you don't clean often enough.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  4. Finally proof.. by Metex · · Score: 2, Funny

    that when I was young our stone tablet punchcards had bugs and man were they huge

    --
    Never could figure out why my girl liked my bitch tits, then I found out she was a lesbian.
  5. Mouth = wings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...fossilised mouth parts of an insect discovered in Scotland in 1928 has turned out to be the oldest winged insect yet.

    It had wings on its mouth, did it? How can you really tell without, say, a piece of fossilized body? Did someone just say, "hey, this looks close enough to that big blue bug we stepped on yesterday"?

    1. Re:Mouth = wings? by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It had wings on its mouth, did it? How can you really tell without, say, a piece of fossilized body?

      You allways need a whole body to identify a creature huh AC? You can't tell a rhino from a cow just by looking at its head?

      Well guess what, biologist who specialise in fossilised insects can recognise them on based on their distinctive mouth parts.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:Mouth = wings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You allways [sic] need a whole body to identify a creature huh AC?

      No, but you need to read the article carefully before you speak, lest you wedge your foot in your mouth. Here's the important bit, since you obviously didn't read the article:

      "Rhyniognatha could have had wings, say the authors, but this is impossible to confirm since the wings themselves are missing."

      Care to try again?

    3. Re:Mouth = wings? by nobody69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      When discussing organisms at the genus level and up, you usually find that looks of seemingly unrelated characteristics are found together. Iirc from my zoology classes a decade-plus ago, mouthparts are pretty variable in insects, so it's not that unlikely that going an insect could be identified as a flyer from just the mouth parts.

      Of course, since all fossils are fakes, this discussion is probably moot:)

      --
      "Bugger this, I want a better world." - Jenny Sparks
  6. how old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "lived between 408 and 438 million years ago"... so it was 30 million years old? no wonder it went to live in Scotland!

    1. Re:how old? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Shouldn't it have moved to Florida?

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
  7. Protowings? by ktanmay · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article is pretty sketchy on details, so here's something that will help a little. Now here's the most important part from that article, "Rhyniognatha could have had wings, say the authors, but this is impossible to confirm since the wings themselves are missing."

    1. Re:Protowings? by Glenda+Slagg · · Score: 3, Funny
      So something 420 million years ago liked to pull the wings off flies???

      Ah - the more things change, the more they stay the same...

      --
      - - Sha la la la . . .
    2. Re:Protowings? by El · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, perhaps protowings do not fossilize very well? Are there samples of amber going back 400 million years that we should be looking in?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  8. BBloopers by timothv · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Featured in today's BBlooper

  9. Jaws and wings by axolotl_farmer · · Score: 5, Informative

    How can they tell that these mandibles are from a winged insect when there are no wings fossilized?

    Winged insects and silverfish (the closest realtice of the winged insects) share several advanced traits. One is how the mandible attaches to the head capsule. This type of mandible attaches by two point and is called 'dicondylic'.

    The fossil mandibles are clearly dicondylic, and are also of a type not known from silverfish at all. They are of a broad chewing type more associated with 'higher' insects such as grasshoppers or cockroaches. Since there are no wings, they can't be abolutely sure if this was a winged insect or an unknown wingless insect more closely related to winged insects that to silverfish.

    1. Re:Jaws and wings by olclops · · Score: 1

      Maybe they found the fossil buried in the sky.

  10. Cmdr Taco fondled my junk liberally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Hello ghey niggaz!

  11. He kept ignoring the referee by gnaasympathizer · · Score: -1

    In the back seat

    --
    Help stamp out slashdot trolls--send $1 to GNAA PO Box 69 Key West, FL 32269-069
  12. this conversation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    [shivers]

    Silverfish...mandibles attaching to head capsule...chewing type...not known from silverfish...

    [shivers some more]