Oldest Fossilised Winged Insect Yet Discovered
tr0llb4rt0 writes "The Scientific American reports on an article in Nature (paid subscription required for full text) on how the fossilised mouth parts of an insect discovered in Scotland in 1928 has turned out to be the oldest winged insect yet discovered, pushing back the age of the earliest appearance of winged insects nearly 80 million years.
Previos fossils of winged insects have dated to around 330 million years and scientist believe this new discovery lived between 408 and 438 million years ago. "
Yeah, it was infesting someone's Windows 3.11 system.
Hi i want to allocate memory for an array of pointer to a class, with an int i would do :
:
int *i = new int[iMyValue];
i[0] = 10;
i[1] = 5;
etc etc
However this technique does not seem to work with my classes
class MyClass;
MyClass *hello = new MyClass[iMyValue];
hello[0] = new MyClass;
hello[1] = new MyClass;
etc etc
So I want a dynamic array of pointer to MyClass. Whats the best way to do this?
Cheers
The classic essay on "worse is better" is either misunderstood
Hm, only 8 comments - maybe nobody's interested because its a boring dead bug.
I found a small pile of tan dust with two fly wings on top in my mini-tower the other day, but *I* didn't submit it.
that when I was young our stone tablet punchcards had bugs and man were they huge
Never could figure out why my girl liked my bitch tits, then I found out she was a lesbian.
It had wings on its mouth, did it? How can you really tell without, say, a piece of fossilized body? Did someone just say, "hey, this looks close enough to that big blue bug we stepped on yesterday"?
"lived between 408 and 438 million years ago"... so it was 30 million years old? no wonder it went to live in Scotland!
The article is pretty sketchy on details, so here's something that will help a little. Now here's the most important part from that article, "Rhyniognatha could have had wings, say the authors, but this is impossible to confirm since the wings themselves are missing."
Featured in today's BBlooper
How can they tell that these mandibles are from a winged insect when there are no wings fossilized?
Winged insects and silverfish (the closest realtice of the winged insects) share several advanced traits. One is how the mandible attaches to the head capsule. This type of mandible attaches by two point and is called 'dicondylic'.
The fossil mandibles are clearly dicondylic, and are also of a type not known from silverfish at all. They are of a broad chewing type more associated with 'higher' insects such as grasshoppers or cockroaches. Since there are no wings, they can't be abolutely sure if this was a winged insect or an unknown wingless insect more closely related to winged insects that to silverfish.
Hello ghey niggaz!
In the back seat
Help stamp out slashdot trolls--send $1 to GNAA PO Box 69 Key West, FL 32269-069
[shivers]
Silverfish...mandibles attaching to head capsule...chewing type...not known from silverfish...
[shivers some more]