Slashdot Mirror


Candidate Ads, Coming Soon To An Inbox Near You

ooby writes "MSNBC reports that Bush and Kerry plan to shoot off a million or so emails to their closest friends. By using the Internet to distribute ads, presidential candidates believe they can reach more people using less money. I guess that's why they wrote that loophole in that awesome new spam law."

11 of 505 comments (clear)

  1. if they spam me by cyrax777 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They will certanly not get my vote!!

  2. The solution by Bendebecker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Email them all back. See how they like it.

    --
    There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
    most of us won't be able to afford it.
    -- Lemmy
  3. Email? What about phone?! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've gotten 3 or so phone calls from *#$#$ Kerry supporters. When the last one started off on all the great things Kerry was going to do, I basically said "That's exactly why I'm not voting for him. Thanks for calling!"

    Of course, I probably wouldn't be so annoyed if his platform didn't amount to nothing more than "I'm not Bush!" As a Senator, he's voted in favor of just about everything that Slashdotters despise. Why do you people like this guy?

    1. Re:Email? What about phone?! by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Last year we here in Louisiana had a gubenatorial run-off. The year before we had an ugly US Senate run-off where both sides did copious amounts of telephone campaigning (canned messages from Bush, Daschle, et al) which pretty much got everybody angry (or so they say, there were still more voters in the run-off than the open primary).

      At any rate, last year there was very little telephone campaigning, except towards the end there were a few calls here and there at annoying hours for one candidate, and when word got around that candidate accused his competitor of hosting the telephoning in order to frame him.

      Are you sure those calls are really from Kerry supporters?

      One of the two reasons I'm not happy about "campaign finance reform" is that focusing more on limits and less on accountability actually helps things like this happen. The more otherwise legitimate contributions are forced to be made in roundabout manners, the more chaffe the truly despicable campaign practices have to hide among.

  4. Hard enough to find a good candidate... by Skynyrd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm not too impressed with anybody in the race, but if I'm getting spam from them - there's no way in hell I'd vote for them.

    Their spam will be sent back. Their "voter feedback" form will be used to explain why I would never buy a product advertised by spam - including the President.

    1. Re:Hard enough to find a good candidate... by starm_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Am I the only one who thinks that text is a much better medium that television for political campaigning? With television parties are force to blurt out only the catchy slogans that alure the general public because of time constraints.

      With text, tey can explain much more what their vision is. They can put links to more information. They can educate the public on their views much better.

      I mean it depends on what they do with it, but I think it could have potential.

  5. who's paying? by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So are they going to make my bandwidth tax-deductable?

  6. The most interesting question . . . by Nakito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    . . . is this: Where are they obtaining the email addresses for these mass mailings? The article states that they have "millions" of addresses. I find it hard to believe that millions of people have opted in to receive political email. I wonder if they political parties are instead using the same kinds of purchased email databases used by other large-scale spammers.

  7. Referrer spamming by fatwreckfan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Disturbing as this is, a friend that has a blog has been getting referrer spam to candidates' webpages of all things.

    If you're unfamiliar with the term, referrer spamming is when fake HTTP Referrer headers are used to make referrers show up in webserver logs so the webmasters think they are linked to by that site.

    He was getting only porn spamming up until about a month ago, when the presidental candidate pages started showing up.

  8. Re:better spam than mass-mailings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I want to hear it, I'll go to their website. Saves the trees, and keeps my inbox clear.

    They're profitting by this e-mail (paid if elected), so it's spam.

    So fuck um both. I hope someone brings a class action lawsuit against them if they do this horse-shit.

  9. Re:OT: Political culture by demachina · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Dean has the opposite position of the average American on just about every political issue."

    This is an odd assertion. I think its widely recognized that Dean was the only Democrat with the hutzpah to:

    - attack Bush
    - oppose the Patriot Act
    - oppose the Iraq war both for the deception used in selling it and the mess its proving to be
    - denounce special interests and the way they are outright purchasing our government

    Dean's fortunes really turned because Kerry, in particular, stole his message when he realized it was resonating with the majority of Democrats if not half the electorate as a whole. This leaves us with a bizarre hypocrisy where Kerry is now critical of the war in Iraq though he voted for it. He is critical of the Patriot Act though he voted for it and may have written predecessors of it. He is criticizing special interests though he takes more special interest money than anyone in the Senate.

    A real plus about Kerry is, if you don't like his positions on the issues, you can just wait a while and he will flip sides to the one you like. Of course he also flips from positions you like to ones you don't with equal randomness. He is completely devoid of conviction which means he is "electable".

    In all fairness, Dean did a lot of damage to himself when he stuck his foot in his mouth a few times on things like Saddam and Bin Laden. Its real hard to be a loose cannon, and take controversial positions, and also not stick your foot in your mouth sometimes.

    If it hadn't been for Dean the Democrats would have gone in to this election cowering in fear of Bush's invincibility and they would have gone down in flames. Now they at least have a chance since Dean gave them a backbone. Dean also made the first attempt in a while to actually restore democracy to this screwed up country by getting ordinary people involved in politics again, especially with the aid of the Internet which is likely to be the only thing that might save democracy in America. Unfortunately all those people are tasting the bitter pill of how the establishment and the media destroy anyone trying to restore actual democracy, with a little d, to this country. End result is we will have two wealthy aristocrats, both Yale grads, both members of Skull and Bones squaring off in November, to see whether we will have an establishment Democrat or an establishment Republican taking their turn in the White House.

    Dean might have said stupid things about Bin Laden, but its not quite as bad as the Bush family having intimate ties to the Bin Laden family. Bush also hushed up the extent Saudi Arabia was involved in 9/11 at the same time they were trying to pin it on Iraq which was probably the country in the Middle East that had the least involvement with Al Quaida, Bathists being secular socialists, not fundementalists, who claim to be Muslim mostly out of convenience. It still seems to be completely lost on Americans, smart people that they are, that the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi for the most part. There were no Iraqi's.

    --
    @de_machina