Book too big? Watch the movies!
by
orthogonal
·
· Score: 4, Informative
And if reading the fascicle is too heavy going, remember that you can watch the movies instead, at http://scpd.stanford.edu/knuth/. Fourteen videos of Knuth's lectures are aavailable, inclusing last years's "Tenth Annual Christmas Tree Lecture: Finding All Spanning Trees".
I watched the Tenth Annual Christmas Tree lecture live (the "trees", of course, being various computer science graphs and structures, not pine trees hung with colored lights) and found it surprisingly engaging and accessible even to an educated lay-person. If you have any interest in computer science or algorithm design, it's a fascinating way to spend an hour. (Disclaimer: I'd just watched the 1998 lecture to better understand Garsia-Wachs coding.)
I was so excited about watching it live that I submitted the Knuth Christmas lecture as a story about it to Slashdot, but the editors didn't think it important enough to accept. (Nor the story on "brain fingerprinting" -- a kind of polygraph based on direct reading of brain waves -- casting doubt on a death sentence, nor Eagle's drummer Don Henley's op-ed piece in the Washington Post attacking the music industry and ruminating on p2p, nor the story about Anglo-German scientific rivalry and the resulting pickled baby "dragon".)
Give up copyrights to the community and let the community to help you writing the text.
I hope you're joking.
Have you tried reading TAoCP? This is not some computer book but is an in-depth study of all the mathematics that Computer Science comprises. Some of the exercies would serve as topics for a PhD thesis (and are marked as such).
Suffice it to say that writing these books is not an easy task and I'm not sure if the series will ever get finished. I'm still on the first volume, so I don't know if I'll ever finish the series. Even though wikipedia shows us that a community effort can produce some good writing, I doubt it could ever produce something as in-depth as TAoCP.
And besides this, I think Addison-Wesley would have something to say about putting TAoCP in public domain.
publication schedule....
by
jeffy124
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
general question: His publication schedule appears to be 2007 for Volume 4, 2010 for Volume 5, plus other work following that. I'm a little concerned about his age. I dont know how old he is, but he is retired and seems to have been for quite some time. Will he live long enough to actually finish Vol 5?
-- The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
Re:publication schedule....
by
kurosawdust
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Knuth was born in 1938, making him 65-66 years old, 72-73 when the planned release of Volume 5 comes around. It's going to be a tight squeeze no doubt, but it's not impossible; Knuth could pull a Chomsky and keep on writing books into his eighties.
Re:publication schedule....
by
__past__
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Remember that he is already some years (decades?) past his original schedule.
TAOCP will not be finished. Period. Knuth is too much of a genius, and a
perfectionist, to actually manage to complete it in his lifetime. It will end
up like Karl Marx' Kapital (which was planned to have 6 volumes, and he died
early in preparing the third - which some people argue was only the third part
of volume 1), with few people actually understanding all of it, and heated
debates of what things might mean in the light of the never-written later
parts.
With the exception that fewer people will die because of such
controversies in Knuth' case, because there aren't too many militant
guerilla groups fighting for the right way to do seminumerical algorithms.
Re:publication schedule....
by
Animats
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
In 1968, one could order the entire set for under $100, to be delivered as they were written.
I wonder how many people are still waiting.
Re:publication schedule....
by
WillAdams
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Probably that's supposed to be funny, but for those who don't understand the context of the joke, Dr. Knuth is running behind (didn't I just write this up recently?) because
1 - the work itself is huge (when first asked to write it he delivered some six or seven _hundred_ pages of manuscript as the first _chapter_, causing his editor to ask, ``Don, just how long is this book going to be?''
2 - publishing switched from hot metal type set by a combination of casting machines and hand-work for mathematics typography to phototypesetters and after digital typesetters. Because of the limitations of the early typesetting systems, Dr. Knuth saw it as his obligation to set aside everything else and write a publishing / typesetting system for mathematics --- he thought it would be done over his sabbatical of that year, some decades later he announced TeX complete and frozen at version 3 (w/ a version number tending toward pi and a several hundred dollar reward for finding a bug).
Lest you think TeX is irrelevant in these graphical days, TeXinfo is the basis for the GNU documentation format, an awful lot of XML gets typeset programmatically by TeX (look up xmltex for one example), Adobe uses TeX's H&J as the basis for the ``multi-line composer'' in their InDesign page layout application (by way of URW's HZ), and there're wonderful new formats such as ConTeXt and documentclasses such as KomaScript and Memoir _and_ w/ the new edition of _The LaTeX Companion_ soon to be published, work on LaTeX3 should accelerate.
William
-- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
Re:ask the community
by
kurosawdust
·
· Score: 4, Informative
The community can help already. Download the fasciles and comb them for errors, as is explicitly requested on Knuth's news page.
Re:ask the community
by
orthogonal
·
· Score: 4, Funny
Like the one that asks: Prove that there is no solution for a^n+b^n=c^n for n>2
If only Addison-Wesley would print the volumes of TAoCP with bigger margins, we might have an answer to that already!
Re:ask the community
by
WillAdams
·
· Score: 5, Informative
It's worth noting that a number of Dr. Knuth's books are available insofar as is possible --- look for _The TeXbook_ and _The METAFONTbook_ in particular, also his _Mathematical Writing_, and of course, one can typeset the (Literate Programming) source of tex.web to essentially get the book _TeX: The Program_ (only up-dated;)
Dr. Knuth has also published some _way_ cool commentary on programs as literate commentary on them, esp. look for his coverage of _The Colossal Cave Adventure_
William
-- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
By the way, these are *pre* fascicles.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Informative
I forgot to mention that when I submitted the article. It also seems that pre-fascicle 2c has been renamed to pre-fascicle 3a. Seeing that pre-fascicles 2a and 2b total 138 pages and that 3a and 3b total 156 pages, perhaps the "real" fascicles 2 and 3 will shortly arrive (unless fascicle 1 has to be completed first).
By the way, I'd start looking for errors in pre-fascicle 3c, the $2.56 reward applies to pre-fascicles as well. (I got a check from Knuth for one in one of the previous ones -- quite an amazing thing to get one of those famous checks!)
And if reading the fascicle is too heavy going, remember that you can watch the movies instead, at http://scpd.stanford.edu/knuth/. Fourteen videos of Knuth's lectures are aavailable, inclusing last years's "Tenth Annual Christmas Tree Lecture: Finding All Spanning Trees".
I watched the Tenth Annual Christmas Tree lecture live (the "trees", of course, being various computer science graphs and structures, not pine trees hung with colored lights) and found it surprisingly engaging and accessible even to an educated lay-person. If you have any interest in computer science or algorithm design, it's a fascinating way to spend an hour. (Disclaimer: I'd just watched the 1998 lecture to better understand Garsia-Wachs coding.)
I was so excited about watching it live that I submitted the Knuth Christmas lecture as a story about it to Slashdot, but the editors didn't think it important enough to accept. (Nor the story on "brain fingerprinting" -- a kind of polygraph based on direct reading of brain waves -- casting doubt on a death sentence, nor Eagle's drummer Don Henley's op-ed piece in the Washington Post attacking the music industry and ruminating on p2p, nor the story about Anglo-German scientific rivalry and the resulting pickled baby "dragon".)
Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
I hope you're joking.
Have you tried reading TAoCP? This is not some computer book but is an in-depth study of all the mathematics that Computer Science comprises. Some of the exercies would serve as topics for a PhD thesis (and are marked as such).
Suffice it to say that writing these books is not an easy task and I'm not sure if the series will ever get finished. I'm still on the first volume, so I don't know if I'll ever finish the series. Even though wikipedia shows us that a community effort can produce some good writing, I doubt it could ever produce something as in-depth as TAoCP.
And besides this, I think Addison-Wesley would have something to say about putting TAoCP in public domain.
general question:
His publication schedule appears to be 2007 for Volume 4, 2010 for Volume 5, plus other work following that. I'm a little concerned about his age. I dont know how old he is, but he is retired and seems to have been for quite some time. Will he live long enough to actually finish Vol 5?
The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
The community can help already. Download the fasciles and comb them for errors, as is explicitly requested on Knuth's news page.
Like the one that asks: Prove that there is no solution for a^n+b^n=c^n for n>2
If only Addison-Wesley would print the volumes of TAoCP with bigger margins, we might have an answer to that already!
Opinions on the Twiddler2 hand-held keyboard?
It's worth noting that a number of Dr. Knuth's books are available insofar as is possible --- look for _The TeXbook_ and _The METAFONTbook_ in particular, also his _Mathematical Writing_, and of course, one can typeset the (Literate Programming) source of tex.web to essentially get the book _TeX: The Program_ (only up-dated ;)
Dr. Knuth has also published some _way_ cool commentary on programs as literate commentary on them, esp. look for his coverage of _The Colossal Cave Adventure_
William
Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
I forgot to mention that when I submitted the article.
It also seems that pre-fascicle 2c has been renamed to pre-fascicle 3a.
Seeing that pre-fascicles 2a and 2b total 138 pages and that 3a and 3b total 156 pages, perhaps the "real" fascicles 2 and 3 will shortly arrive (unless fascicle 1 has to be completed first).
By the way, I'd start looking for errors in pre-fascicle 3c, the $2.56 reward applies to pre-fascicles as well. (I got a check from Knuth for one in one of the previous ones -- quite an amazing thing to get one of those famous checks!)