Slashdot Mirror


Cell Phone with Camera = Scanner

An anonymous reader writes "TechJapan has posted a translation of an Impress Watch Article regarding a new technology developed by NEC and the Nara Institute of Science and Technology, that lets people use their cellular phones with cameras as scanners. It says all you have to do is move your phone over the surface of the piece of paper while recording a movie, and the technology (some sort of software I presume) will construct a high resolution image from the individual frames of the video. Here is the original (Japanese) NEC press release." I'd love to see before and afters to see how well this works.

18 of 237 comments (clear)

  1. that's great but... by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    does it make phone calls?

    1. Re:that's great but... by SoTuA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's funny, but it also is true. I would love to have a cell phone that is small, nice looking and JUST MAKES CALLS AND STORES ADRESSES! Why must we overpay for tons of features that we don't want or need.

    2. Re:that's great but... by Ian+Wolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know of all the things we export to other nations: McDonald's, David Hasselhoff, and obnoxious tourists, we should have sent you the Federal Communications Commission, The US Patent Office, and Carrot Top.

      --
      "The words of the prophets are written on the Slashdot walls."
    3. Re:that's great but... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I seriously doubt that you are *overpaying* for features.

      Compare the situation to PC hard drives: You can get a 120GB HD for something like $80. That's like $0.67/GB. By that logic, if you only wanted a new 10GB HD, you should be able to get one for $7, right? But you can't. There's about a $30-35 minimum outlay for a harddrive. Once manufacturers have the basics in place, adding extra/bigger platters in almost *free.*

      Near about the same thing with phones. You can probably get a barebones, does nothing but make calls and store numbers cell phone for about $75. But since all the electronic components are already there, they can easily add in a gazillion sotware features for very little $$ and charge $100 for it, which they vast majority of people will pay for.

  2. Ocr? by rotciv86 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why make a hi-res image, why not just OCR it? That could probably even be done on the phone. Then you could email or send it as a plain text document, much smaller file size then an image.

    --


    My ghEtt0 webpage.
    1. Re:Ocr? by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it might not be text?

    2. Re:Ocr? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OCR is overrated still. It's not that accurate, and needs more processing power than your cell phone has on board. It's still not ready for primetime.

    3. Re:Ocr? by BJH · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because OCRing Japanese text is a lot more difficult than with English text?

      I'm not kidding - there are Japanese OCR apps, but the accuracy is way below English OCR unless you're using a really good page image.

    4. Re:Ocr? by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wouldn't OCR be more difficult in Japanese than english? With english many letters are required to create a single word, thus if individual letters are not properly recognized they can still be determined by their context within both the word and the entire sentence.

      In Japanese there are fewer symbols per word, many more symbols to choose from, and symbols that contain much more detail.

      So I would think OCR in Japanese would be many times more difficult than OCR in english.

      Finally, you now have a phone that is only useful for scanning Japanese. If it acted like a real scanner then it would be useful for any language.

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
  3. Re:And I wonder when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    its called a fax machine.

  4. Old tech by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember seeing news about Japanese scanner pens (smaller than any cell phone nowadays) that would let you write with it, OCR scan text, and it store the text. I don't have a link right now because I'm lazy. But those were a few hundred dollars back then - maybe eight years ago.

    This is probably just a combination of that technology (which never took off here) and the cell phone feature craze.

  5. In related news by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stay tuned for the explosive shockumentary, where we demonstrate how two tin cans and a piece of string make for a handy alternative to VoIP.

  6. One way or the other it's coming. by ahfoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Whether some trick like this makes it happen sooner rather than later only time will tell, but eventually just in terms of raw resolution camera equipped cell phones will be functional full-color scanners.
    And this is where things get interesting because fair use permits compies of material in the library for research. But if enough students scan journals at high resolution and then organize and exchange them through the Net, there will be an enormous levelling of the academic playing field. That is a time I look forward to with eager anticipation.

  7. Virtual Wide Angle Lenses? by jobbegea · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It only mentions paper as the object to take a picture of, but it might also work for objects further away. This could solve the problem of the often very narrow angle lenses those tiny cameras have.
    Stitching multiple images automatically is nothing new but is CPU intensive. So Moore's law will take care of that.

    --

    Net sa best, mar it koe minder
  8. Re:Here's the text of the article by laird · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember many, many years ago seeing people working on this sort of thing at the MIT Media Lab. The idea was that you could take a standard resolution video that panned across a scene, and by merging the frames over time create amazingly high resolution images. I remember motion being tricky to deal with (as in, things moving in the scene) because it would either confuse the algorithm that tried to figure out exactly where the camera was pointed for each frame, or cause things to blur. But if you panned across a landscape, the result was an amazingly high quality image.

  9. Security Alert! by erick99 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Remember when some folks couldn't take Furby toys to work because of their ability to record or whatever and that made them a security risk? I wonder if this phone that can scan documents might not prompt the same sort of thing in some places. Hey, it could happen....

    Take care!

    Erick

    --
    http://www.busyweather.com/
  10. Re:Here's the text of the article by La+Gris · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AS a visually impaired person born with a loke low resolution retina. I can say that I used this ton compensate my disability to see details if not near enough.

    My brain compensated this by applying a continous eye movment (nystagmus). This allow my brain to get several low resolution moving pictures and be able to compute the missing sharpness and details.

    Many born visually impaired have this nystagmus as some compensation.

    I'am glad this become a mathematically and scientifically analyzed process. This is great it get some practical use. This remind me of the pictur analysis and filtering applyed to Hubble when it was known is main mirror could not focus correctly.

    --
    Léa Gris
  11. So now we know how the tricorder will involve by johannesg · · Score: 4, Funny
    Years ago as I watched Star Trek, I was always left wondering just how Kirk and Spock managed to control all those alien devices they found. Eventually Bluetooth came around, and I realized it was because soon every device in the universe will have a Bluetooth interface (if you are in the US this may be hard to believe, but bear with me). Clearly the tricorder has a Bluetooth interface as well, which is why it can talk to and even control doomsday weapons, planetary defences, ancient medical equipment, etc.

    That still left the question how the tricorder came into being. Did someone sit down one day and say to himself, "I am going to build myself a tricorder?" That just doesn't seem very likely to me.

    But now I finally figured that out too. The tricorder will evolve from the mobile phone! Every year you can see how more and more sensor functionality is added, while the physical size of the phone is getting smaller and smaller. First they could just acquire audio signals. Then came video signals. Soon it will be able to monitor your heartrate, body temperature, and various other vital signs, and maybe even automatically call 911 if you get into trouble. Sensors for electricity, magnetism, seismic waves, spectral analysis, alien energy, and other things will invariably follow, driven as they are by our lust for gadgets, useless functionality, and the latest and greatest. Meanwhile rest assured that ever-increasing software capabilities will provide the ability to make rudimentary medical diagnosis, do chemical analysis, and contain drivers for every alien Bluetooth-enabled device in a thousand lightyears.

    While we are at it, you can rest assured that the very moment someone develops a universal translator, it will be embedded in a mobile phone.

    So there we have it: the tricorder in a small, handy package. There are only two downsides that I can see: if we are to believe Star Trek, it will at some point lose its communication functionality (Kirk was always using a separate communicator), and based on current trends the battery life may not exceed 2-3 minutes...