MS Security Chief: Windows Never Exploited Until Patch Available
BenBenBen writes "The head of Microsoft's security business and technology unit states that Windows is never vulnerable until a patch appears, and that releasing patches is what causes exploits to be developed. Good quotes: 'We have never had vulnerabilities exploited before the patch was known', and '[he] could only think of one instance when a vulnerability was exploited before a patch was available'. Erm..."
Direct quote from the end of the article
---------
"Almost all attacks against our software are against the legacy systems," he said.
"If you want more secure software, upgrade."
If Linux 2.2.XX had security holes they would say upgrade.
:p
Bzzzt! Wrong answer. Linux 2.2.xx and even 2.0.xx is still being actively maintained for bugfixes
"Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
Yet another way to look at this is that Microsoft's future direction for security is to not improve the software but to stop issuing patches? LOL!
ChaoticChaos
"Some days you just can't ask for a better present than this!"
> The implication there is that only Microsoft finds exploits.
I hate to be an instigator... but that sounds like a ch4113ng3 to me...
- For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat
"If you want more secure software...", dump Windoze.
in Soviet Russia.
Exactly right.