Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Attempts to Block Oracle Bid for PeopleSoft

AliasF97 writes "Thought you all might be interested in this story about the U.S. government attempting to block Oracle's bid for PeopleSoft via a civil anti-trust lawsuit. Seems to me that the courts are going to have their work cut out for them on this one. Also, the photo of Ellison is kind of comical. If you were to throw a black cape and a tall hat on him, he could be a circus magician."

8 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. I sure hope Oracle loses by noaudience · · Score: -1, Troll

    All these corporate aggressive takeovers suck.

    I'm pretty sure the rest of the world doesn't have them too.

    --
    Visit my weblog to find out how interesting and sexy I am.
  2. Fuck Antitrust Laws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Antitrust laws should receive an award for Dumbest Idea Put into Practice by Politicians. If it weren't for the damage they do, they would be a hilarious example of government stupidity. Let me explain.

    The first, obvious, problem is that these laws are intended to prevent monopolies. A monopoly is a legal restriction on who can sell a product or service. Now, the postal service is a monopoly because private companies are not allowed to compete in the shipping and delivery of first class mail. So here's the funny part: the government is responsible for enforcing the antitrust laws. Yup! The same government that created one of the most famous of all monopolies and enforces it by preventing competition. Not a very useful law.

    You're not laughing.

    Of course, the antitrust laws are only used against private companies, companies that are doing well for themselves and their customers. And consumers presumably need no protection from the monopoly that is the United States Postal Service. So the government, under the guise of protecting the consumer, destroys or hobbles the best producers. If it weren't so common for government schemes to backfire completely, you'd probably think this was funny too.

    It gets better. The antitrust laws are used against companies that practice "anticompetitive practices." What counts as "anticompetitive?" Anything aimed at doing better than your competition. In other words, anything that's competitive. So the mere act of competing is considered anticompetitive. Funny yet?

    Well, here's my last and favorite part. Even assuming that the government is right about everything (I know it's hard...just pretend), the laws are still worthless. The government assumes that if a single company becomes the sole producer in a market, they might jack up the price of their product, hurting the little guy. If an energy company jacks up its price by a hundredfold, what would the little guy do? The poor, poor little guy. To prevent this, they use the antitrust laws to beat down any producer who looks like he might take over. In other words, any producer who provides more value or lower cost to his customers.

    Now, the main reason Objectivists dislike these laws is because they're a blatant initiation of force. By forcing companies to act in particular ways beyond simple non-coercion, the government is abandoning the principle of property rights when it comes to companies. In the name of helping the consumer, they enslave the producers, particularly the best of them.

    So here's the punch-line. If a single producer jacking up his price is really the problem they're trying to solve, and given that they don't care about property rights in the slightest, why not wait until a single producer actually does do that? That's right. If they're going to trample rights, why not just wait until the "bad" thing has actually happened? By their own standards, the antitrust laws are useless.

    Antitrust laws are stupid, evil, and worthless by anyone's standards. Maybe if we tell the politicians we get the joke, they'll take them away.

    http://solohq.com/Articles/Rowlands/Antitrust_La ws --A_Joke.shtml

    1. Re:Fuck Antitrust Laws! by WankersRevenge · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hey Bill,

      Hadn't you better be working on XP reloaded instead of posting on slashdot? You don't want us customers to think your screwing us with your licensing scheme, do you? For a lack of a OS update?

      So come on. Get on the ball. Enough with slashdot. Back to work

      Your's Truly,
      WankersRevenge

    2. Re:Fuck Antitrust Laws! by Killswitch1968 · · Score: -1, Troll

      How convenient there wasn't a single argument in that little diatribe. Oh right, this is slashdot, a band of rabid Linux dogs where everything is free and corporations never satisfy customers.

      --

      Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    3. Re:Fuck Antitrust Laws! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Yup, Standard Oil kicked ass back in the day. We need another Standard Oil in this world.

  3. ~- TROLLTALK XP -~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The Pyramids

    The Golden Age of Athens

    Rome, 117 AD

    The Renaissance

    The Enlightenment

    Mel Gibson's "The Passion"

    and now,

    Trolltalk XP

    Better than Gay5.
    Better than 20721.
    Better than fags-r-us.
    Much, much better than adequacy.

    A new hope. A new community. A new place for trolls to share their craft.

    Trolltalk XP

    Better than any trolltalk. EVAR

    Join founder Amsterdam Vallon in what is surely to be the most vibrant and creative community endeavor of the 21st century.

  4. FRESHMEAT ENDORSES G.N.A.A !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    (this was submitted as a slashdot article but no luck so far...) Yes, all you mother fucking gay niggers out there... freshmeat.net will now endorse your local rallys and political campaigns. Read more here. All that remains to be known is whether or not Freshmeat will partner with the Goatse.cx guys. We await more new with baited breath!

  5. That's not Larry... by march · · Score: -1, Troll

    That's not Larry, it this with a beard!!