Building Community Social Capital w/ WiFi?
demosi asks: "I'm involved in the NOMAD project, which is described
here. Part of the work involves determining how community wireless services can be best used to build social capital (i.e. whether something will have a positive affect on the productivity of a community and its members), by promoting communication in a trustworthy environment. We're asking Slashdot readers if they're involved in similiar projects and if they're interested in measuring the network effects of community WiFi across different countries and cultures?"
...as mentioned in this post from a little while back, I've been informally putting together a 'non-internet' wireless access point design as an experiment.
I actually have it working at a basic level (publically-accessible access point, dhcp to hand out IP addresses, BIND configured to hand out the AP's IP as the address for anything they type in [initially] so that they can get to it at any time, web server (to be loaded up with legally-free files for public download)...
Still more to add, but what I have so far does appear to work. I haven't had a chance to make use of it well yet though, to see if anyone uses it (I need to get a higher-powered 802.11b card that can take an external antenna).
If this sort of thing sounds interesting to people, I could try setting up a site devoted to the project somewhere...
Hacker Public Radio is our Friend
[ you and I are ugly ]
Bowling Alone is a great book but SOME forms of social capital work well over the internet. My effectiveness as a scientist is significantly enhanced by exchanging information with people I've never met. Responding to reasonable requests (e.g. for copies of papers, or for bacterial cultures useful in research) is part of global scientific culture, reinforced by the impact of one's reputation (which is enhanced by helping other scientists) on success in getting grants, jobs, and promotions. It helps that scientists can't use pseudonyms, at least not in their work, so your reputation follows you for life. See "Social Cost of Cheap Pseudonyms"p ers/identifie rs/
http://www.si.umich.edu/~presnick/pa
Direct human interaction is still very important, though. Wifi may mean more people hanging out in coffee-houses, rather than accessing the internet from home, but will they talk to people around them?
No offense, but if you are going to use big terms like "social capital", you should also know the difference between affect and effect.
He used the word "affect" properly if he meant emotional effect.
I am considering providing various parts of my relativley small town (16,000) with free WiFi. The only thing stopping me right now is time. Start a website devoted to the project.
Yes that's exactly what I meant. Read the post again. I'm perfectly aware of the difference between the two words and also the need for considered interpretation before I respond to something.
The 'dumbness' of the idea will be determined after we've collected our data, studies and analysed it.
I'd say the good that can come from free access to information for the masses must not be underrated in the determination of what amounts to "social capital"!
Wow, start using phrases like that and you might as well just go out and find yourself a nice frilly dress to wear, lady.
"Erm, but here's my proposal. Let's get tough. The time for talking is over. Call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard and hit it fast with a major - and I mean major - leaflet campaign, and while it's reeling from that, we'd follow up with a whist drive, a car boot sale, some street theatre and possibly even some benefit concerts. Okay?"